Not another iraq topic? - *cough*...

SSJKarma · 02-14-2003, 09:30 PM

ok...
ANTI-WAR i am !

i never said there was no real threat by the iraqi, but i sure said there was no real proof nor as the US right to attack em because iraqi broke the laws that the US themseves made ! hell, they even broke their own laws to attain their goal ! (talking about the us) so why would it matter if a single treaty is like that ?

as for the OSAMA BIN-LADEN, he doesn't even have a big role here !
let's see... he aske HIS people to sacrifice when its not actually HIS PEOPLE !
so basically he's asking them to aid him in destroying the us in exchange of strickly nothing !
why would he be a threat when it is clear that he isn't ?

also...
don't you think it is strange that suddently osama has something to do with all this ?
afetr all... set-up are so easy to do !
i think the us just want a justification to attack iraq. so they relyed on osama's attempt to justify their own actions before the publics !
why ? because they know the public will accept the war if it is to avenge the death of the peoples that died in those towers !

basically, this war is just there because the US wanted some vengeance because of those towers. since they didn't have anything against the former country who made the attempt, they are bombing the first coiuntry that show em something !

that's my thought !
why i think that way ?
because in the other topics (i didn't talk much) the two towers appeared in the discussion a lot of times. that proves that the public still want to make a country suffer cause of that attempt but seriously, the towers doesn't even have a single thing to do with this !

again...
why exactly you want to go in war ?
no real proof of them not having weapons, no real proof of them having some !

as for the thing of destroying a nuke plant with a missile !
think before saying stupities... missile are detected by radars and things even before they leaved their own country !
US would now have to intercept it, and if they cannot, they'll just launch one at them too !

you all know it...
in a missile war, we all are loser in the deal !
one launch a missile, the other launch one too, now the first try to intercept and the other try to but once they do they launch another one and that until one has no more weapons !

conclusion...
the us wins no matter what !
sorry, but missile and radar wise, it is dumb to launch missiles in the world were in !

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Issues in iraq	hotsexi_chic	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	48	07-11-2004 08:33 PM
cough - coughyea..*cough	VampireNinja	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	37	07-04-2004 12:03 PM
Us vs iraq - Who would win?	bloodpack	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	10	11-24-2002 02:33 AM
Petition to take out dashing - many people hate the coughbugcough	TarkanX	New features	7	10-15-2001 05:08 PM

02-14-2003, 09:30 PM	#10
SSJKarma Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Canada somewhere in the province of quebec Posts: 5,445 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	ok... ANTI-WAR i am ! i never said there was no real threat by the iraqi, but i sure said there was no real proof nor as the US right to attack em because iraqi broke the laws that the US themseves made ! hell, they even broke their own laws to attain their goal ! (talking about the us) so why would it matter if a single treaty is like that ? as for the OSAMA BIN-LADEN, he doesn't even have a big role here ! let's see... he aske HIS people to sacrifice when its not actually HIS PEOPLE ! so basically he's asking them to aid him in destroying the us in exchange of strickly nothing ! why would he be a threat when it is clear that he isn't ? also... don't you think it is strange that suddently osama has something to do with all this ? afetr all... set-up are so easy to do ! i think the us just want a justification to attack iraq. so they relyed on osama's attempt to justify their own actions before the publics ! why ? because they know the public will accept the war if it is to avenge the death of the peoples that died in those towers ! basically, this war is just there because the US wanted some vengeance because of those towers. since they didn't have anything against the former country who made the attempt, they are bombing the first coiuntry that show em something ! that's my thought ! why i think that way ? because in the other topics (i didn't talk much) the two towers appeared in the discussion a lot of times. that proves that the public still want to make a country suffer cause of that attempt but seriously, the towers doesn't even have a single thing to do with this ! again... why exactly you want to go in war ? no real proof of them not having weapons, no real proof of them having some ! as for the thing of destroying a nuke plant with a missile ! think before saying stupities... missile are detected by radars and things even before they leaved their own country ! US would now have to intercept it, and if they cannot, they'll just launch one at them too ! you all know it... in a missile war, we all are loser in the deal ! one launch a missile, the other launch one too, now the first try to intercept and the other try to but once they do they launch another one and that until one has no more weapons ! conclusion... the us wins no matter what ! sorry, but missile and radar wise, it is dumb to launch missiles in the world were in ! __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://membres.lycos.fr/imagesforum/Banner.gif[/img:sig_uid] "How did you escape my grasp ? no matter, i'll crush you now !" -DB : Lost Soul My Web Site http://membres.lycos.fr/xmvssf/