08-09-2005, 05:21 PM
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: --> East Los Angeles, California c--
Posts: 3,047
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
|
Quote:
True what you said...though some only look at one thing, ''cloning animals for food to resolve world hunger". There is still way too many negatives to just put aside and deal with it later when it actually comes into effect.
All those "negatives" come from bullpoop science fiction. They're pure "What ifs". Here's an even better what if. What if we do this,feed the entire world, bring nations out of poverty and lead to a more ballanced, more prosperous world for everyone?
Quote:
History should have taught as not to neglect a situation untill it becomes a problem to deal with. Cloning cant be the last and only solution for world hunger, even if it happens i dont think it will help much..
Good logic. Millions of peices of food will not solve world hunger.
You get the "logically stupid" award.
Quote:
Cloning is good but not natural, what if someone did a mistake and created something harmful??
Using condoms isn't natural eigther, but you have to do what you have to do.
I bet if it was up to you, you would let the billions of starving people DIE instead of trying to find a solution.
Quote:
If you really cared you would protest against The ones who are cutting trees. Again i use this computer for a reason. To study find info and play a game. Actually scientists do harm the environment, They might kill us. Im not saying science is bad but somethings are just to dangerous.
Like what? What science has killed us?
This isn't the eugenics study. This isn't the study for the automic bomb. This is the study of replecating items to 1) Cure people from deseases or 2) Feed starving nations.
This isn't a problem. you're watching too many science fiction films. Stop.
|
|
|