You know what's actually intriguing. NO ONE.. none of these scientists have actually giving full proof and air tight explanation to the beginning of "things". They always start of at that packet of energy portion... or just straight to the implosion. At least the ones I've come across start from there.
Antimatter doesn't explain the creation of the world as we know it. Quite true that the third paragraph takes a page out of Newton's third law of motion which states that for every action there's an equal but opposite reaction. But the writer of that article doesn't account for the appearance of this antimatter or the engine behind the implosion we have come to know as the big bang.
No matter who's theory you read, it all takes it shape from the fact that the universe in such a very "wierd" implosion of antimatter. It just doesn't make any sense to deduce that everything awesome you see in the world today wasn't engineered by a supreme being.
In the words of Albert Einstein, the universe is to well designed to be without a designer. Whether or not you beleive in Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, Oduduwa or whatever. One thing stands universal... there is a Supreme Being.
Now how much control He or She has over the world can be left to debate... but to deny his or her existence is to try and explain things humanly impossible. As hard as you might try, the only way one can get a full proof explanation to the beginning of things is a time machine. Which as you might believe, is unthinkable right now... but until someone can go back to see things with his or her own eyes, implosion of antimatter doesn't cut it with me.
Whoever wants to disprove this designer, with a full mechanical start point of the big bang theory, that doesn't involve an "I don't know how that part was" should be my guest. But I'll be reading for more :biggrin:
Edited By blanka09 on 1122911199
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://www.boomspeed.com/blanka09/banner2.jpg[/img:sig_uid]
|