![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suspected ripper | Angel-Eyes | Banners, Avatars and Images | 21 | 05-04-2005 03:48 PM |
| Ripper proof! | xXININJAIXx | General | 2 | 08-17-2004 07:25 AM |
| Informing you of a ripper. | THEMASTERRIPPARBUSTER | General | 34 | 07-13-2004 09:19 PM |
| Ripper alert! | xXININJAIXx | General | 29 | 07-02-2004 01:32 PM |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
|
sfo doesnt have half of what quake has- no disrespect to tmyapp, since i do respect your efforts put into creating a shockwave version of a popular arcade game.
but the facts. Quake being a game of almost 6 years i think is still very intense to play online. You get a very good thrill playing it. Quake is about a thousand times more popular than sfo even for its old age. The are way more active users on quake then there are on sfo. Quake is a commercial game. sfo is not. Quake is moddable. sfo is not. lag from Quake is different then lag on sfo. since one or the other has more data to transfer during a game. SFo doesnt not have more stuff than quake.Get your facts straight buddy Sure SFO is a great game in your opinion , but dont overexaggerate its limitations. Also, In no way am i supporting LeHa by posting this. I just had to get my point across Edited By montalvo on June 23 2004 at 23:40
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://www.digikitten.com/playhousev2/files/montalvo/dubya tee eff.jpg[/img:sig_uid] We lost the SuperBowl! XD |
|
|
|
|
|