/images/killer/custom/forumbanner2.png
SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums

Go Back   SFO Archive Forums > NON-SFO Related > General
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts SFO Staff Search

User Tag List

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debate forum - For us to debate in Virtual Fighter New features 23 10-16-2004 06:59 PM
Major events after 1986....or before.. - 1 scientific,1 literary, 1 civic,etc. SBYRD5 General 0 09-21-2003 03:51 PM
Db"z" vs sf...pl debate... - Come in and debate...if you dare! Gotenks13 General 31 11-22-2002 04:37 PM
Religious Debate Razz General Comments and Strategies 21 09-12-2001 09:31 AM
multi player tag team - two human vs. two human GamerDH New features 4 08-28-2001 07:45 AM

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-25-2004, 02:16 PM   #11
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Default

[quoteost_uid0="(ShinKu_Ryu)"]blah blah blah blah..........joe my scientific prove is that many scientist's have dfferemt views on this matter... ??? so do i....[/quote]
That's not scientific proof. Find me a SCIENTIFIC website authored by a SCIENTIST explaining why evolution is false, and it'll be valid debate material. But you claiming that scientists have different views on human evolution, without backing up your claim with sources, isn't valid debate material.

Quote:
and stop putting wors in my mouth :angryfire: ...I never said i wsa right and you where wrong...So why if we evolved from so-called apes , there is no next stage for us or for the apes right now..i nkow that you tried giving some proof about what i just asked,... but why is it that the apes right now are not as close as us
First off, I'm going to state right off the bat that this is THEORY, scientists have yet to prove it, so it's THEORY.

The THEORY is that 5 million years ago, a specie of ape-like creature inhabited the forests and jungles of the land. Due to some sort of schizm....rivalries between males, etc....a large population of them was driven out of the forests and into the plains and grasslands of the world. This exiled group eventually evolved into homo sapiens sapiens, the modern-day human. They evolved and morphed AWAY from the ape-like creatures in appearance and behavior and features because these features were no longer necessary in the grasslands of the world, they were only needed in the jungle and forest situations.

It is speculated that apes did not evolve much farther because they were already at home in their environments. They had already more or less adapted to their homes in the jungles and the trees, and therefore no further change was required (same goes for sharks and alligators and crocodiles....they are virtually unchanged, the same creatures now that existed 70 million years ago.) Virtually all evolutionary biologists and anthropoligists are more or less on the same page about this.

Now you keep saying that there's no next step for humans. This is not true, and I said that this is not true. I said that humans will continue to evolve, just not as much (or at all) physically as we will evolve mentally. I've said this many, many times, and you continue to ask me the same question over and over even after I answer this. No, this is NOT fact, it's theory, and moreover, my theory. I have yet to find any articles written by scientists on the subject of FUTURE human evolution, and therefore do not know what actual scientists believe.
  Reply With Quote
 
Forum Jump




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%
Page generated in 0.27721 seconds with 31 queries