Human evolution from a scientific stantpoint - Scientific debate, not a religious one

Shinku Ryu

There is no scientific facts against this.......?!! but just tell me..and if we dont need to evolve again as you say..so why do scientist's say it might have been this way. and i saw the discovery about it to...but i did not bother to see all of it...

Do you even READ my posts? I NEVER said that i don't think we don't need to evolve. I said that I think we're going to continue natural evolution on a MENTAL level. Not that we completely stopped. I said that us being completely stopped is a POSSIBILITY, but it's not my own belief.

I don't know about what other scientists say on the matter, as I don't know any scientists to ask. I'll have to TRY and find sources on scientists outlooks, but that will be rather difficult considering the fact that scientists having public editorial sections on the internet is rather uncommon.

SSJKarma
so nantuko, you admit with me that we are the ones creating stuffs, so if we are making mistakes then why wouldn't we be making a big mistakes with most of our technologies, then why would science be any better then religions ?

Because man created the idea of religion. Man did NOT create the idea of science, because science has been around all along. Man DEVELOPED THE ABILITY to be able to interpret scientific data...they did not create the idea of science.

Man created the idea of religion. Evidence of this is found in the fact that hundreds of different religions exist in the world. If religion created man, then only one religion would exist. But since there are many religions, it goes to show that in different areas of the world, different people had different outlooks on religion, and therefore created their own. Science, on the other hand, is universally accepted, because there is only ONE science, and it yields evidence of its existence.

and as far as i know, a debate about evolution of mankind cannot be won by neither party ! why ? because neither can prooves their theories, so basically this is an impossible to win debate. and seriously, you can't just try and back this stuffup with things like what you said... why ?
because even if many scientists have came to the same conclusion. they are still theories. just like any religions !

Actually, they WOULDN'T be theories.

Tell me, so you are saying that science is merely a theory.

Are Newton's Laws of Motion theories also? Because last I checked, they were tried, tested, tried and proven true. And are evident in EVERYDAY life. Same as the theory of relativity, same as every single chemical equation, same as every single biological function. It's all FACT. Why? Because it's been tried, tested, and proven true.

Now the THEORY of human evolution is just that....THEORY. However, once more evidence is gathered, all the holes filled in, all the questions answered, then guess what? It will be proven FACT. Not "theory," as you claim, because all evidence in the world will point away from evolution and point straight towards science. It's happened already in other aspects of science and religion, and will surely happen over and over again in the future.