Human evolution from a scientific stantpoint - Scientific debate, not a religious one

03-24-2004, 06:08 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="(ShinKu Ryu)"]Roll what u got against me..?!? <!--emo&??? i know that you and joe agree on this nonsense but.............

Anywaz....to get back to the topic, Natuku joe i will try to make you understand.......i know its hard for your brain but....

roll,....you said that we dont evolve anymore becuse we dont need to...i do agree with some facts that scientist's have proven but this one i dont and never will......

ok...This is some proof i can give for now....lets go back to Adam and Eve....not adam and steve joe

Those where the first humans god created....the where already evolved from babbons as you say....This is funny because i dont think god would create those babbons first and then us humans.......thats something scientist's got to think for a moment before the make all this conclusions...

And joe dont act smart by correcting my spelling...thnx[/quote]
Ahem.....

This is a SCIENTIFIC DEBATE. NOT RELIGIOUS!

Look at the topic title: Human evolution from a SCIENTIFIC standpoint.

Look at the topic description: Scientific debate, NOT a religious one

Therefore, since that post is incredibly off-topic, it's really considered spam.

Secondly, even IF religion was allowed in this debate, your "adam and eve" is NOT proof. Why? Becuase religion does not HAVE proof, only blind faith.

By the way....why did you bring up 'adam and steve?' Are you implying that I'm gay by believing in science and not religion? By saying that you want to turn the topic to "adam and eve, not adam and steve joe," you are therefore implying that I have been talking about "adam and steve" and you don't want to hear it anymore. However, since I have not once mentioned an "adam and steve," I am getting the rather distinct feeling that you are attempting to insult me, something you definately don't want to do. I don't believe in 'adam and steve,' despite what you apparently claimed. I also don't believe in 'adam and eve' either. Now...

<span style='font-size:11pt;line-height:100%'>RELIGION IS NOT PROOF!</span>

Or, to be more specific....the Bible is NOT proof!!

Now THAT is something YOU have to think about before YOU make such conclusions.

Bring up religion again and I'm getting a mod to delete your post. Do it yet again, and that will definately constitute as spamming, and you can probably be banned if you keep it up for much longer. If you don't have scientific evidence to debate with, then don't post anything at all.

Edited By Shauku on Mar. 24 2004 at 21:20

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Debate forum - For us to debate in	Virtual Fighter	New features	23	10-16-2004 06:59 PM
Major events after 1986....or before.. - 1 scientific,1 literary, 1 civic,etc.	SBYRD5	General	0	09-21-2003 03:51 PM
Db"z" vs sf...pl debate... - Come in and debate...if you dare!	Gotenks13	General	31	11-22-2002 04:37 PM
Religious Debate	Razz	General Comments and Strategies	21	09-12-2001 09:31 AM
multi player tag team - two human vs. two human	GamerDH	New features	4	08-28-2001 07:45 AM

03-24-2004, 06:08 PM	#11
Guest Posts: n/a Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: Post(s) Tagged: Thread(s) Quoted: Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="(ShinKu Ryu)"]Roll what u got against me..?!? <!--emo&??? i know that you and joe agree on this nonsense but............. Anywaz....to get back to the topic, Natuku joe i will try to make you understand.......i know its hard for your brain but.... roll,....you said that we dont evolve anymore becuse we dont need to...i do agree with some facts that scientist's have proven but this one i dont and never will...... ok...This is some proof i can give for now....lets go back to Adam and Eve....not adam and steve joe Those where the first humans god created....the where already evolved from babbons as you say....This is funny because i dont think god would create those babbons first and then us humans.......thats something scientist's got to think for a moment before the make all this conclusions... And joe dont act smart by correcting my spelling...thnx[/quote] Ahem..... This is a SCIENTIFIC DEBATE. NOT RELIGIOUS! Look at the topic title: Human evolution from a SCIENTIFIC standpoint. Look at the topic description: Scientific debate, NOT a religious one Therefore, since that post is incredibly off-topic, it's really considered spam. Secondly, even IF religion was allowed in this debate, your "adam and eve" is NOT proof. Why? Becuase religion does not HAVE proof, only blind faith. By the way....why did you bring up 'adam and steve?' Are you implying that I'm gay by believing in science and not religion? By saying that you want to turn the topic to "adam and eve, not adam and steve joe," you are therefore implying that I have been talking about "adam and steve" and you don't want to hear it anymore. However, since I have not once mentioned an "adam and steve," I am getting the rather distinct feeling that you are attempting to insult me, something you definately don't want to do. I don't believe in 'adam and steve,' despite what you apparently claimed. I also don't believe in 'adam and eve' either. Now... <span style='font-size:11pt;line-height:100%'>RELIGION IS NOT PROOF!</span> Or, to be more specific....the Bible is NOT proof!! Now THAT is something YOU have to think about before YOU make such conclusions. Bring up religion again and I'm getting a mod to delete your post. Do it yet again, and that will definately constitute as spamming, and you can probably be banned if you keep it up for much longer. If you don't have scientific evidence to debate with, then don't post anything at all. Edited By Shauku on Mar. 24 2004 at 21:20