Human evolution from a scientific stantpoint - Scientific debate, not a religious one

SSJKarma · 03-24-2004, 11:21 AM

completely false !
ok, lots of invention were created in a good causes and ended up used for bad purposes, want me to name a few...

the ATOMIC BOMB !
the TNT

and the likes !
if these weren't mistakes, man, then i don't know what they were !
we are a foolish speci who wants to rule the world by being the only speci who can think like we do. that you cannot deny. it is the law of survival. a law of nature that all living thing do. so why, wouldn't the human race be good in any sens !

i didn't say all we did was wrong, neither have i said that they were all right !

but our science up to now was never based on any facts, only theory that we supposedly prooved to be right by making them be right !

that means science is nothing more then a man made theory which if mankind makes mistakes, makes those theory not so reliable either !

example, if scientifics would tell you that they have the cure to all desease in existence by simply swallowing a pile, and then they are prooving it to you, by testing on a subject. would believe them just because they prooved it to you or would you be sckeptic even tho they have prooved it to you ?

exactly...
there are many things in existence that were proven in existence and still are denyed by many scientists who say other scientist are wrong !

so how can science be all good and facts when even the scientist themselves are still fighting off each other ?

my point is clear here... science do not proove anything since it is man made theories. nothing more !

and i didn't bring it back to religion, it was a comparision !
you say science is prooven because millions of people study it. then why aren't religion prooved when millions study it as well !

in any cases... what i'm saying is...
religions aren't entirely right, and science isn't entirely right !

you still didn't answered my question tho...
who told you 2+2=4 ?
if you answer humans, then tell me how this was prooven to be true ?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Debate forum - For us to debate in	Virtual Fighter	New features	23	10-16-2004 06:59 PM
Major events after 1986....or before.. - 1 scientific,1 literary, 1 civic,etc.	SBYRD5	General	0	09-21-2003 03:51 PM
Db"z" vs sf...pl debate... - Come in and debate...if you dare!	Gotenks13	General	31	11-22-2002 04:37 PM
Religious Debate	Razz	General Comments and Strategies	21	09-12-2001 09:31 AM
multi player tag team - two human vs. two human	GamerDH	New features	4	08-28-2001 07:45 AM

03-24-2004, 11:21 AM	#11
SSJKarma Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Canada somewhere in the province of quebec Posts: 5,445 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	completely false ! ok, lots of invention were created in a good causes and ended up used for bad purposes, want me to name a few... the ATOMIC BOMB ! the TNT and the likes ! if these weren't mistakes, man, then i don't know what they were ! we are a foolish speci who wants to rule the world by being the only speci who can think like we do. that you cannot deny. it is the law of survival. a law of nature that all living thing do. so why, wouldn't the human race be good in any sens ! i didn't say all we did was wrong, neither have i said that they were all right ! but our science up to now was never based on any facts, only theory that we supposedly prooved to be right by making them be right ! that means science is nothing more then a man made theory which if mankind makes mistakes, makes those theory not so reliable either ! example, if scientifics would tell you that they have the cure to all desease in existence by simply swallowing a pile, and then they are prooving it to you, by testing on a subject. would believe them just because they prooved it to you or would you be sckeptic even tho they have prooved it to you ? exactly... there are many things in existence that were proven in existence and still are denyed by many scientists who say other scientist are wrong ! so how can science be all good and facts when even the scientist themselves are still fighting off each other ? my point is clear here... science do not proove anything since it is man made theories. nothing more ! and i didn't bring it back to religion, it was a comparision ! you say science is prooven because millions of people study it. then why aren't religion prooved when millions study it as well ! in any cases... what i'm saying is... religions aren't entirely right, and science isn't entirely right ! you still didn't answered my question tho... who told you 2+2=4 ? if you answer humans, then tell me how this was prooven to be true ? __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://membres.lycos.fr/imagesforum/Banner.gif[/img:sig_uid] "How did you escape my grasp ? no matter, i'll crush you now !" -DB : Lost Soul My Web Site http://membres.lycos.fr/xmvssf/