 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rule breakers - Wat is this | evryoung8998 | General Comments and Strategies | 21 | 11-30-2004 09:06 PM |
| 6 post rule? - What is it ? | evilhadoken | RaNdOm iNsAnItY | 11 | 10-10-2004 11:59 AM |
| 50 cents and ja rule | blanka09 | General | 19 | 05-15-2003 07:50 PM |
| Sorry about that stupid name topic. - Just wanna apologize it was a dumb topic | apocolypse83 | RaNdOm iNsAnItY | 9 | 12-03-2002 01:25 PM |
| New Rule | Warmor | General Comments and Strategies | 7 | 03-06-2002 09:26 AM |
 |
|
 |
11-27-2002, 02:03 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Post Thanks / Like
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
|
Warrior, no disrespect, but I think it's a stupid rule also. You said "No reviving under no circumstances", what if someone wants to bring one back for memories? Or... someone wants to bring it back because they have a real good/important comment about it? I know you said to link it, but would you rather see a new thread startd saying "This comment is about that thread on page 69", instead of just reviving it?
So, I think yer rule should be modified a bit, I think it should say "No reviving if it's useless!" Oh and Thanks Karma for starting this thread.
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v135/XxElPeCaDoRxX/zorade.gif[/img:sig_uid] I don't put my heart on women, I put my hard-on on women! |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Threaded Mode
|
|
