Insane war world! - 99.999999% probability you will die! - Page 2

01-20-2003, 01:41 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]Back in '91, Saddam signed a treaty that would allow UN inspectors into Iraq. Suddenly, he won't let them in. This is a clear violation if the treaty, and it obviously means he's got something hidden that he doesn't want the UN to find. He's obviously hiding weapons...and the discovery of the warheads further suggests this.

The fcuking bastard is up to something, and if we don't strike first, he will. It's that simple. We shoulda killed the fcuking cuntrag back in '91[/quote]
You really buy that ####? Lol...

Bush's reasons for doing this? I dunno... probably oil and/or to look good in the media. But make no mistake, politicians (including Bush), do not act upon their moral obligations (ie: "war on terrorism bs"). Nor do they give a #### if people break treaties...

The only reason they'd care about that is if they had a damn good reason for wanting them to comply with these old terms.. in this case, to look good in the media and possibly oil. If you remember, oil was the reason the US defended Kuaite.

You know Saadam allowed UN inspectors into the country and "complied" with US demand, right? That proves one simple thing... he's not going to strike first, and never intends to. He's in power because he wasn't stupid enough to go all out on the US in '91, and in fact wouldn't have invaded Kuaite if he'd known the US would retaliate. Right now, he's been trying to talk his way out of it... because he doesn't want to fight the US.

Saadam's not stupid, he wants to stay in power.

Nantuko Joe · 01-20-2003, 03:18 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="2000warrior"][quote

ost_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]Back in '91, Saddam signed a treaty that would allow UN inspectors into Iraq. Suddenly, he won't let them in. This is a clear violation if the treaty, and it obviously means he's got something hidden that he doesn't want the UN to find. He's obviously hiding weapons...and the discovery of the warheads further suggests this.

The fcuking bastard is up to something, and if we don't strike first, he will. It's that simple. We shoulda killed the fcuking cuntrag back in '91[/quote]
You really buy that ####? Lol...

Bush's reasons for doing this? I dunno... probably oil and/or to look good in the media. But make no mistake, politicians (including Bush), do not act upon their moral obligations (ie: "war on terrorism bs"). Nor do they give a #### if people break treaties...

The only reason they'd care about that is if they had a damn good reason for wanting them to comply with these old terms.. in this case, to look good in the media and possibly oil. If you remember, oil was the reason the US defended Kuaite.

You know Saadam allowed UN inspectors into the country and "complied" with US demand, right? That proves one simple thing... he's not going to strike first, and never intends to. He's in power because he wasn't stupid enough to go all out on the US in '91, and in fact wouldn't have invaded Kuaite if he'd known the US would retaliate. Right now, he's been trying to talk his way out of it... because he doesn't want to fight the US.

Saadam's not stupid, he wants to stay in power.[/quote]
When the bastard's breaking of treaties threatens America and its allies..then yes, he DOES care about breaking treaties.

And you seriously think they're doing this for oil or media popularity? You make me sick. WE'VE GOT A PSYCHOTIC DICTATOR WITH CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS WHO CAN THREATEN THE WORLD, AND YOU THINK IT'S BECAUSE OF "MEDIA"? and what the hell do you mean "war on terrorism bs"? IT'S NOT BS! The motherfcukers attacked our country, and you think that he's not seriously trying to get back at them? dubya tee eff is with that?

And the US defended Kuwait because of oil...BECAUSE THE PSYCHO FCUKER SADDAM SET THE FIELDS ON FIRE!! BECAUSE THE MIDEAST IS PRETTY MUCH THE WORLD'S ONLY SUPPLIER FOR OIL, AND IF HE CONTROLLED THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY, HE'D PRETTY MUCH BE CONTROLLING THE WORLD ITSELF!

And yer right about one thing...he doesn't want to "fight' the US. He wants to bomb us so we don't have a chance to strike back with full force. For nine years the bastard complied with UN officials. Why suddenly deny them access to Iraq? He's OBVIOUSLY hiding something in the country...someting he doesn't want us to discover. He only "let" us back in when he had cleaned it up...or thought he did...which is why we found the warheads.

But to think our government is pulling this "act" for money or media...is just plain fcuked up. Sure, the US government is corrupt, and fcuked up, but it's not THAT fcuked up.

Yer post makes me sick...it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. How could you say that about the US?

montalvo · 01-20-2003, 03:37 PM

#### this war. #### president bush.
Why the #### does america always gotta be involved in something?
I dont support this or any war.
All this war is about is controling the oil fields in iraq. Bush doesnt give a #### about any of us.
If we get attacked, he gets to safely be up in air force one or some high security base while everyone is getting killed.
I think this is gonna start up world war 3 or some ####.
F U C K WHAT YOU HEARD

princevegetam · 01-20-2003, 04:05 PM

stupid americans, the recent crap just pisses me off more.

why the #### do you think almost every part of the world is protesting against war? you think they're retards? they all know exactly the kind of fliped up game that U.S. is playing. and #### it man, if U.S. had proof that iraq had weapons of mass destruction why haven't they let it out yet? protect their sources? if the proof were good enough in the first place, then their sources wouldn't need protecting.

americans(mainly that retard named bush)=igonorant bastards who are worse than the iraqis. because they just don't care about "peace". they only care about the oil from iraq. why the #### do you think the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea for having all this nuclear ####? why do you think the U.S. is ignoring them while they talk all this #### about the U.S.? it's cause the U.S. would gain NOTHING from attacking north korea. no oil, no resources, no power, no nothing. and the U.S. has to sacrifice more resources for a war on North Korea because they have an obligation to supply the ppl in North Korea with food. it's good for their image.

bullpoop americans,

die die die

:angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire:

SolidSnake76 · 01-20-2003, 04:09 PM

and now he's starting to raise suspicsions on saudi arabia. such a jackass.

the US is very friendly with saudi arabia. why? its is the country with the most oil. if we go to war against them, i dont know what congress is gonna do but we cant afford it. and dont say 'we can just drill in alaska'. those environmentalist are trying to stop congress from doing so.

and if we go to war with iraq and take over, he will level his oil fields as an act of vengance. then what? problem is the US gets into too many global affairs.

montalvo · 01-20-2003, 04:17 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="princevegetam"]stupid americans, the recent crap just pisses me off more.

why the #### do you think almost every part of the world is protesting against war? you think they're retards? they all know exactly the kind of fliped up game that U.S. is playing. and #### it man, if U.S. had proof that iraq had weapons of mass destruction why haven't they let it out yet? protect their sources? if the proof were good enough in the first place, then their sources wouldn't need protecting.

americans(mainly that retard named bush)=igonorant bastards who are worse than the iraqis. because they just don't care about "peace". they only care about the oil from iraq. why the #### do you think the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea for having all this nuclear ####? why do you think the U.S. is ignoring them while they talk all this #### about the U.S.? it's cause the U.S. would gain NOTHING from attacking north korea. no oil, no resources, no power, no nothing. and the U.S. has to sacrifice more resources for a war on North Korea because they have an obligation to supply the ppl in North Korea with food. it's good for their image.

bullpoop americans,

die die die

:angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire:[/quote]
whoa whoa whoa. its not all of us.....
Its these faggots that are currently in power.
There is no minority that i know of that supports this war.

Roll · 01-20-2003, 05:28 PM

That is enough! We don't need a war inside the forums, Nantuko, Vegetam, 2000warrior.

iori · 01-20-2003, 05:35 PM

[quote

ost_uid6="Yasback"][/quote

ost_uid6]
craza......

Nantuko Joe · 01-20-2003, 05:39 PM

Quote:

#### this war. #### president bush.
Why the #### does america always gotta be involved in something?
I dont support this or any war.
All this war is about is controling the oil fields in iraq. Bush doesnt give a #### about any of us.
If we get attacked, he gets to safely be up in air force one or some high security base while everyone is getting killed.
I think this is gonna start up world war 3 or some ####.
F U C K WHAT YOU HEARD

F U C K what I heard? GODDAMN FCUK WHAT YOU SAY!! This fcuking war is NOT about some fcuking oil fields! You fcuking closed-mided fcuks think that just because you fcuking THINK you fcuking know what's going on! You have no fcuking idea! This is not about america being selfish. This is about America trying to protect the rest of the fcuking world. And you ask why america always gets involved? If america didn't get involved with World War II in Europe, the Jews would be an extinct race and Hitler would be running the world. Only thanks to AMERICA did the fcuker commit suicide and we saved the rest of Europe (and the world). If America didn't get involved in the Persian Gulf, Saddam would be in control of over 75% of the world's oil supply, which would make him a fcuking dictator of the world! Do you really want to be taking orders from Hitler or Saddam? I didn't fcuking think so!

Quote:

why the #### do you think almost every part of the world is protesting against war? you think they're retards? they all know exactly the kind of fliped up game that U.S. is playing. and #### it man, if U.S. had proof that iraq had weapons of mass destruction why haven't they let it out yet? protect their sources? if the proof were good enough in the first place, then their sources wouldn't need protecting.
americans(mainly that retard named bush)=igonorant bastards who are worse than the iraqis. because they just don't care about "peace". they only care about the oil from iraq. why the #### do you think the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea for having all this nuclear ####? why do you think the U.S. is ignoring them while they talk all this #### about the U.S.? it's cause the U.S. would gain NOTHING from attacking north korea. no oil, no resources, no power, no nothing. and the U.S. has to sacrifice more resources for a war on North Korea because they have an obligation to supply the ppl in North Korea with food. it's good for their image.
bullpoop americans,
die die die

:angryfire: :angryfire: FCUK YOU AND WHATEVER RACE YOU FCUKING ARE, YOU FCUKING DOOSHBAG!! FCUKING RACIST BASTARD! STOP TRYING TO PUT THE BLAME ON AMERICA, AND FCUKING BLAME FCUKING IRAQ AND FCUKING SADDAM HUSSEIN! HE'S THE FCUKIING PROBLEM, NOT US, YOU FCUKING PIECE OF $HIT!! SO DON'T YOU FCUKING DARE TO TRY AND FCUKING BADMOUTH AMERICA! DON'T YOU FCUKING DARE TO FCUKING LABEL ALL AMERICANS AS YOU ARE DOING, YOU FCUKING GODDAMN MOTHERFCUKER!

Quote:

and now he's starting to raise suspicsions on saudi arabia. such a jackass.
the US is very friendly with saudi arabia. why? its is the country with the most oil. if we go to war against them, i dont know what congress is gonna do but we cant afford it. and dont say 'we can just drill in alaska'. those environmentalist are trying to stop congress from doing so.
and if we go to war with iraq and take over, he will level his oil fields as an act of vengance. then what? problem is the US gets into too many global affairs.

THE US ONLY GETS INVOLVED TO PROTECT THE WORLD FROM FCUKING DICTATORS LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN! BUT EVERYBODY FCUKING THINKS THEY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON, THINKS THAT AMERICA IS THE BADGUYS! AND IT FCUKING PISSES ME OFF!

G_GUNDAM · 01-20-2003, 06:39 PM

just read the bible for goodness sake ??? all of us are going to hell anyway :angryfire:

and for me........im going to hell with gasoline in my draws :angryfire: :laughlong: :laughlong:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Help me please - I feel like i am goin insane!	gameboymaster	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	15	10-04-2004 12:40 PM
Insanity - Insane pople	masterbob	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	6	09-21-2004 06:21 PM
What if... - A probability topic	bloodpack	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	23	03-16-2003 01:50 AM
Insanity - Act insane!	chun_ai	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	24	12-08-2002 08:12 AM
Insane - Insane	chun_ai	RaNdOm iNsAnItY	8	11-08-2002 05:09 AM

01-20-2003, 01:41 PM	#11
Guest Posts: n/a Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: Post(s) Tagged: Thread(s) Quoted: Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]Back in '91, Saddam signed a treaty that would allow UN inspectors into Iraq. Suddenly, he won't let them in. This is a clear violation if the treaty, and it obviously means he's got something hidden that he doesn't want the UN to find. He's obviously hiding weapons...and the discovery of the warheads further suggests this. The fcuking bastard is up to something, and if we don't strike first, he will. It's that simple. We shoulda killed the fcuking cuntrag back in '91[/quote] You really buy that ####? Lol... Bush's reasons for doing this? I dunno... probably oil and/or to look good in the media. But make no mistake, politicians (including Bush), do not act upon their moral obligations (ie: "war on terrorism bs"). Nor do they give a #### if people break treaties... The only reason they'd care about that is if they had a damn good reason for wanting them to comply with these old terms.. in this case, to look good in the media and possibly oil. If you remember, oil was the reason the US defended Kuaite. You know Saadam allowed UN inspectors into the country and "complied" with US demand, right? That proves one simple thing... he's not going to strike first, and never intends to. He's in power because he wasn't stupid enough to go all out on the US in '91, and in fact wouldn't have invaded Kuaite if he'd known the US would retaliate. Right now, he's been trying to talk his way out of it... because he doesn't want to fight the US. Saadam's not stupid, he wants to stay in power.

01-20-2003, 03:18 PM	#12
Nantuko Joe Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Right behind you... Posts: 1,479 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="2000warrior"][quoteost_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]Back in '91, Saddam signed a treaty that would allow UN inspectors into Iraq. Suddenly, he won't let them in. This is a clear violation if the treaty, and it obviously means he's got something hidden that he doesn't want the UN to find. He's obviously hiding weapons...and the discovery of the warheads further suggests this. The fcuking bastard is up to something, and if we don't strike first, he will. It's that simple. We shoulda killed the fcuking cuntrag back in '91[/quote] You really buy that ####? Lol... Bush's reasons for doing this? I dunno... probably oil and/or to look good in the media. But make no mistake, politicians (including Bush), do not act upon their moral obligations (ie: "war on terrorism bs"). Nor do they give a #### if people break treaties... The only reason they'd care about that is if they had a damn good reason for wanting them to comply with these old terms.. in this case, to look good in the media and possibly oil. If you remember, oil was the reason the US defended Kuaite. You know Saadam allowed UN inspectors into the country and "complied" with US demand, right? That proves one simple thing... he's not going to strike first, and never intends to. He's in power because he wasn't stupid enough to go all out on the US in '91, and in fact wouldn't have invaded Kuaite if he'd known the US would retaliate. Right now, he's been trying to talk his way out of it... because he doesn't want to fight the US. Saadam's not stupid, he wants to stay in power.[/quote] When the bastard's breaking of treaties threatens America and its allies..then yes, he DOES care about breaking treaties. And you seriously think they're doing this for oil or media popularity? You make me sick. WE'VE GOT A PSYCHOTIC DICTATOR WITH CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS WHO CAN THREATEN THE WORLD, AND YOU THINK IT'S BECAUSE OF "MEDIA"? and what the hell do you mean "war on terrorism bs"? IT'S NOT BS! The motherfcukers attacked our country, and you think that he's not seriously trying to get back at them? dubya tee eff is with that? And the US defended Kuwait because of oil...BECAUSE THE PSYCHO FCUKER SADDAM SET THE FIELDS ON FIRE!! BECAUSE THE MIDEAST IS PRETTY MUCH THE WORLD'S ONLY SUPPLIER FOR OIL, AND IF HE CONTROLLED THE WORLD'S OIL SUPPLY, HE'D PRETTY MUCH BE CONTROLLING THE WORLD ITSELF! And yer right about one thing...he doesn't want to "fight' the US. He wants to bomb us so we don't have a chance to strike back with full force. For nine years the bastard complied with UN officials. Why suddenly deny them access to Iraq? He's OBVIOUSLY hiding something in the country...someting he doesn't want us to discover. He only "let" us back in when he had cleaned it up...or thought he did...which is why we found the warheads. But to think our government is pulling this "act" for money or media...is just plain fcuked up. Sure, the US government is corrupt, and fcuked up, but it's not THAT fcuked up. Yer post makes me sick...it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. How could you say that about the US?

01-20-2003, 03:37 PM	#13
montalvo Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 794 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	#### this war. #### president bush. Why the #### does america always gotta be involved in something? I dont support this or any war. All this war is about is controling the oil fields in iraq. Bush doesnt give a #### about any of us. If we get attacked, he gets to safely be up in air force one or some high security base while everyone is getting killed. I think this is gonna start up world war 3 or some ####. F U C K WHAT YOU HEARD __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://www.digikitten.com/playhousev2/files/montalvo/dubya tee eff.jpg[/img:sig_uid] We lost the SuperBowl! XD

01-20-2003, 04:05 PM	#14
princevegetam Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hell Posts: 1,690 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	stupid americans, the recent crap just pisses me off more. why the #### do you think almost every part of the world is protesting against war? you think they're retards? they all know exactly the kind of fliped up game that U.S. is playing. and #### it man, if U.S. had proof that iraq had weapons of mass destruction why haven't they let it out yet? protect their sources? if the proof were good enough in the first place, then their sources wouldn't need protecting. americans(mainly that retard named bush)=igonorant bastards who are worse than the iraqis. because they just don't care about "peace". they only care about the oil from iraq. why the #### do you think the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea for having all this nuclear ####? why do you think the U.S. is ignoring them while they talk all this #### about the U.S.? it's cause the U.S. would gain NOTHING from attacking north korea. no oil, no resources, no power, no nothing. and the U.S. has to sacrifice more resources for a war on North Korea because they have an obligation to supply the ppl in North Korea with food. it's good for their image. bullpoop americans, die die die :angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire: __________________ [quote:sig_uid]the strong survive, and the weak just die...[/quote:sig_uid] http://www.boomspeed.com/ssjvegetam/Iori2.jpg

01-20-2003, 04:09 PM	#15
SolidSnake76 Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Brooklyn NY Posts: 3,076 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	and now he's starting to raise suspicsions on saudi arabia. such a jackass. the US is very friendly with saudi arabia. why? its is the country with the most oil. if we go to war against them, i dont know what congress is gonna do but we cant afford it. and dont say 'we can just drill in alaska'. those environmentalist are trying to stop congress from doing so. and if we go to war with iraq and take over, he will level his oil fields as an act of vengance. then what? problem is the US gets into too many global affairs. __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/SolidSnake76/thevet.jpg[/img:sig_uid]

01-20-2003, 04:17 PM	#16
montalvo Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 794 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="princevegetam"]stupid americans, the recent crap just pisses me off more. why the #### do you think almost every part of the world is protesting against war? you think they're retards? they all know exactly the kind of fliped up game that U.S. is playing. and #### it man, if U.S. had proof that iraq had weapons of mass destruction why haven't they let it out yet? protect their sources? if the proof were good enough in the first place, then their sources wouldn't need protecting. americans(mainly that retard named bush)=igonorant bastards who are worse than the iraqis. because they just don't care about "peace". they only care about the oil from iraq. why the #### do you think the U.S. doesn't attack North Korea for having all this nuclear ####? why do you think the U.S. is ignoring them while they talk all this #### about the U.S.? it's cause the U.S. would gain NOTHING from attacking north korea. no oil, no resources, no power, no nothing. and the U.S. has to sacrifice more resources for a war on North Korea because they have an obligation to supply the ppl in North Korea with food. it's good for their image. bullpoop americans, die die die :angryfire: :angryfire: :angryfire:[/quote] whoa whoa whoa. its not all of us..... Its these faggots that are currently in power. There is no minority that i know of that supports this war. __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://www.digikitten.com/playhousev2/files/montalvo/dubya tee eff.jpg[/img:sig_uid] We lost the SuperBowl! XD

01-20-2003, 05:28 PM	#17
Roll Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 2,647 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	That is enough! We don't need a war inside the forums, Nantuko, Vegetam, 2000warrior. __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://www.boomspeed.com/roll/Hikaru-2.jpg[/img:sig_uid] Perhaps.. I've overstayed my welcome..

01-20-2003, 05:35 PM	#18
iori Senior Member Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Edmonton Posts: 321 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[quoteost_uid6="Yasback"][/quoteost_uid6] craza...... __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v107/Iori45/karatekick.gif[/img:sig_uid] Just me,Iori

01-20-2003, 06:39 PM	#20
G_GUNDAM Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 793 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	just read the bible for goodness sake ??? all of us are going to hell anyway :angryfire: and for me........im going to hell with gasoline in my draws :angryfire: :laughlong: :laughlong: __________________ fear is my pleasure, hatred is my nourishment........... [img:sig_uid]http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfolders/upload5/TESTAMENT.jpg[/img:sig_uid] [img:sig_uid]http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfolders/upload6/ggxtestament.jpg[/img:sig_uid]