Capcom vs snk!: debate - Ahh.. yes... the long rivalry...

[princevegetam]

[quoteost_uid0="Tantum"]lol... exactly my point... the longer SF progresses, the more the "clones" become complete opposites, unlike with KoF, where they stay the same, and Garou had better graphics, and smoothness by far. and why does everyone say that dan is a clone? because he has an uppercut? 80% of SNK characters have dragon punches, or did at one time.

Garou, and Samurai Showdown is where it's at for SNK, dump the KoF, it's getting old... because when they get new chars, no one cares... ( no pun intended, lol ) but in SF, everyone welcomes new chars with glee... because more than likely, it's not just another lame a$$ clone like in KoF.

and, are you gonna see more people at the KoF2002 box, or the MvsC3 box?

how bout the KoF2002 box, or the Garou 2 box? Garou.... why? it's a better quality game... just like... Showdown 2 was tons better than Showdown 3, why? SNK gets too far ahead of themselves, TAKE YOUR TIME... they don't need a new KOF every damn year!! make one GOOD one every two-three years.[/quote]
what lameass clone? 95% of all KOF characters are unique. and the all new KOF 2002 characters are original. the only SNK characters that have dragon punch is ones that has ryo's style of fighting. the only reason SS2 was better than SS3 is cause there were less characters. that was all. the fans wanted to see more like in SS2.