![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Warning to all norms - *warning* must read | thedesktops | General Comments and Strategies | 34 | 10-13-2004 10:24 PM |
| The rank system is the a problem with it - Is this true about the raank system | bestoutof2 | Bugs and Problems report | 4 | 07-03-2004 07:25 AM |
| Favorites system - Whats your favorite system? | lilalexrulz | RaNdOm iNsAnItY | 15 | 01-18-2004 06:30 AM |
| Warning WARNING - this is some hot shit right here | General Comments and Strategies | 13 | 11-16-2001 02:25 PM | |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
New Member
|
My mistake then, Nferno. This forum acting up on me with the double posts and I tried to delete one of them I ended up deleting both.
But to comment on this situation, why put 1 block if the next action will be a banment? That doesn't make sense. What is the difference between one block and five blocks if you can be banned in a drop of a hat? The warning blocks should go if they are not going to be used effectively. EDIT You are right, Wind. You can't leave warnings up to interpretation. They should've been specific as to what Restavega did wrong in particular to earn that warning block. Restavega said alot of things in the post he got warned for. Edited By MaDPoWer on 1116827457
__________________
I call 'em like I see 'em. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|