Human evolution from a scientific stantpoint - Scientific debate, not a religious one

Angel-Eyes · 03-24-2004, 03:03 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="Shauku"]kester_, this is a debate. What you just did is NOT debating.

First off, you are claiming to contain more knowledge of the matter than the people who wrote your sources. And you say that my ideas are ludicrous.

Secondly, I never said I didn't believe your sources, because you never even cited any. I said your final "theory" did not make sense, and ASKED for a source. Therefore, I ask that you give me the source of the theory you attempted to use in your final "point."

Third, you made a false interpretation of a scientific law, and I corrected you. If you believe I made a mistake in correcting you, then give me reasons. You cannot simply say "i did not interpret the 2nd theory of thermodynamics incorrectly." YOu need to provide reasons for WHY you think you did it correctly. If you don't, then your argument becomes null and void, because you are incapable of supporting it.[/quote]
just because i dont beleive evolution doesnt mean you have to bite my ass off. geez

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Debate forum - For us to debate in	Virtual Fighter	New features	23	10-16-2004 06:59 PM
Major events after 1986....or before.. - 1 scientific,1 literary, 1 civic,etc.	SBYRD5	General	0	09-21-2003 03:51 PM
Db"z" vs sf...pl debate... - Come in and debate...if you dare!	Gotenks13	General	31	11-22-2002 04:37 PM
Religious Debate	Razz	General Comments and Strategies	21	09-12-2001 09:31 AM
multi player tag team - two human vs. two human	GamerDH	New features	4	08-28-2001 07:45 AM

03-24-2004, 03:03 PM	#11
Angel-Eyes Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 2,655 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="Shauku"]kester_, this is a debate. What you just did is NOT debating. First off, you are claiming to contain more knowledge of the matter than the people who wrote your sources. And you say that my ideas are ludicrous. Secondly, I never said I didn't believe your sources, because you never even cited any. I said your final "theory" did not make sense, and ASKED for a source. Therefore, I ask that you give me the source of the theory you attempted to use in your final "point." Third, you made a false interpretation of a scientific law, and I corrected you. If you believe I made a mistake in correcting you, then give me reasons. You cannot simply say "i did not interpret the 2nd theory of thermodynamics incorrectly." YOu need to provide reasons for WHY you think you did it correctly. If you don't, then your argument becomes null and void, because you are incapable of supporting it.[/quote] just because i dont beleive evolution doesnt mean you have to bite my ass off. geez __________________ http://westernposterpage.com/vancleef.jpg

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode