/images/killer/custom/forumbanner2.png
SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums SFO Archive Forums

Go Back   SFO Archive Forums > NON-SFO Related > General
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts SFO Staff Search

 View Poll Results: Yu_gi_oh and metabots - Nothing to do with xmvssf
YU_GI_OH is better than MEDABOTS 17 85.00%
MEDABOTS is better than YU_GI_OH 3 15.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xmvssf/sfo dictionary dark-guardian General Comments and Strategies 47 07-11-2005 02:02 PM
Xmvssf - Sfo Duro0535 General Comments and Strategies 8 08-23-2004 11:17 AM
Xmvssf tournament PSYCHO General Comments and Strategies 5 04-22-2004 01:27 PM
Another xmvssf forum - Another xmvssf forum duntedevil General 10 07-09-2003 04:53 PM
XMvsSF - Who are the best character(s)???? Sahlinja General Comments and Strategies 26 10-20-2001 06:32 PM

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-22-2002, 07:32 AM   #11
oO_HoTSauCeOo
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 614
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 0
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 0
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default

I was watching the first episode of yu-gi-oh, and em...gotta say it was pretty gay...their gonna give their lives for cards? um....ok...

Medabots is gay...just don't like the special effects at all..

Overall Yu-gi-oh i would pefer more
__________________
DNT
oO_HoTSauCeOo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Forum Jump




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:17 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%
Page generated in 0.22168 seconds with 42 queries