The nintendo ds vs. sony's psp - Objective arguments only

[SSJKarma]

Well as i mentionned... i haven't played the PSP but i did see it in action.

both consoles are fine the way they are, even though the DS isn't strong spec wise. it still do not need that much power to run a good FPS game ! tell me compared to the PSP.which console is better for which kind of games. a good example is this one... PSP could be better for fighting games or platform games. but the DS is way better for FPS for it has the mean for the mouselike action. and that is the thing FPS were always all about.

in all honesty... i'm with DAN HIBIKI on this one. the PSP lacks a few features for certain type of games.
as for the all in 1 things...
well again i'm with DAN HIBIKI on this one. thing is HANDHELDS are made for the sole purpose of playing games during a trip.
and SONY seems to start thinking that CONSOLES and PORTABLE COMPUTERS are the very same thing when its actually not.
if you can afford buying games at 50+ dollars and buy the handheld at 100+ dollars then by all means go fetch yourself a portable computer.
believe me it would do you way more goods.

in my view, a console is made for games... back then i didn't expect my SNES or my GENESIS to do me the dinner !
same goes for handheld, at least one company didn't forget that the lower the cost the faster you'll sell !
by having a lot less componnent the DS can truly be sold at a higher rate for it truly won't be cost that much.
thought nintendo were always ont he cash side, i really thin the DS is the handheld for gameplay while the PSP seems to like doing something else then gaming !