Bush vs saddam! - Who would win?

[SolidSnake76]

President Bush Saddam Hussein
56 years, 5' 11", 189lbs 65 years, vital stats are secret.

Weapon Expertise:
Bush: Crack shot, but fined in 1994 for killing a protected bird called a Killdeer.
Saddam: Celebrates by firing guns into the air.

Advatages:
Bush: Can outrun him.
Saddam: Has three doubles. So you're not sure whom you're chasing.

Durability:
Bush: Survived choking on a pretzel.
Saddam: Survived assassination plots and U.S. forces in Desert Storm in 1991.

Weakness:
Bush: Trips over big words.
Saddam: Needs viagra, according to his former mistress.

You decide.

[DX Zero]

saddam :lol:

[Ludacris]

[quoteost_uid0="DX Zero"]saddam :lol:[/quote]
lol......I think it would be a simple way of solving the problems they have without hurting innocent peoples.......but who would win........well none of them........Ben Laden will sneak attack on them, kill them and hide again :biggrin:

[SolidSnake76]

c'mon. be a bit seroius, this was in the newspaper. an iraqi offical says this should happen.

mano a mano.

[tupac2westsider]

Well if u put it in those terms ofcourse Saddam would rape Bush.........But this hole US vs. Iraq is a very complex situation. I mean the US wants to attack Iraq for now reason. The US is willing to attack against the wisheses of the United Nations and also his own congress (even thought they agreed to attack iraq already). The only real reason the bush administration can come up with is that Iraq is making weapons of mass destruction and that isnt even proven.

U.N. weapons inspectors already checked the place in i belive in 1996 and found nothing...........The US told the U.N. Weapon inspectors to pull out of there because they found nothing and now 6 years later there trying to use that same excuse to attack iraq. Iraq has already agreed to let the weapon inspectors in again but the US is not going to take what the UN says to them. there going to attack because they said there going to attack. Now was up with that, i think the US or should i say the bush adminastration.....there doing a bad job so far. Come on this guy just came into office and already wants war :angry:

[SolidSnake76]

he's trying to finish what daddy started. saddam is a dictator but the U.S. gets into too much bullpoop. except WW2.

[DX Zero]

cuz bush cant find osama he find someone else to pick on, and starting a war would cause an economic boom which mean more people gets paid.

[tupac2westsider]

[quoteost_uid0="DX Zero"]cuz bush cant find osama he find someone else to pick on, and starting a war would cause an economic boom which mean more people gets paid.[/quote]
Also true...............But Bush is doing this because if benifist him and his adminastration........Imagin Bush is one of the Biggest oil distributator and if he takes over Iraq imagine all the oil he will have acess to. he will only get richer, So thats one of his reasons why he want to take over iraq. its not because of the nuclear weapons its his own benifits. So who is being the worst Nation the US or Iraq..........The US is going against everything The United Nations tell The US so.........Iraq has a goverment run by a dictator he rose to power by force......Killing, taking out the regular voting syster, elimanating opposing parties, And people with power over unions............Besides the terror hes done to his country he is not charged with anything else Internationaly. U decide who is doing the worst act, for me its bush.

[Ludacris]

[quoteost_uid0="SolidSnake76"]c'mon. be a bit seroius, this was in the newspaper. an iraqi offical says this should happen.

mano a mano.[/quote]
yeah I saw that too on the net.........but like it's going to happen........Saddam could accept the challenge but I doubt Bush.......cuz Bush doesn't look strong and second he counts on his army to win.........

[sk8erfox805]

saddam!!