I suggest we remove this faulty ranking system - bring back the old one!

Token · 12-07-2001, 03:44 PM

the only support youll get for this system are from people who suck, or cant win unless its really laggy.

the old system required you to win, and play, this one lets any old person get lucky and be in the top spot, and then they say their hot shit, and they lost cause of lag. its a horrible system, too faulty.

the other one, of course, wasnt perfect, but it was much better than this new, unstable one.

meh, who agrees? i say we bring back the old one.

Selvin · 12-07-2001, 03:55 PM

I think we should remove this one, don't bring back the old one, but bring in a system where it is done by winning percentage, butyou can only be on the list is if you play 25 games atleast, and you have to play 30 games at least per week.

Token · 12-07-2001, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Quote: from Selvin on 6:55 pm on Dec. 7, 2001
I think we should remove this one, don't bring back the old one, but bring in a system where it is done by winning percentage, butyou can only be on the list is if you play 25 games atleast, and you have to play 30 games at least per week.

i agree, but not with the 30 games a week system.

Selvin · 12-07-2001, 04:03 PM

Do you mean we should remove it copletely, make it higher or make it lower??

Token · 12-07-2001, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Quote: from Selvin on 7:03 pm on Dec. 7, 2001
Do you mean we should remove it copletely, make it higher or make it lower??

lower, or not at all.

Selvin · 12-07-2001, 04:09 PM

So are you saying after you play 25 games you could stay up there for life??

(#### I hate the bugs on this forum. It says I have one reply.)

Token · 12-07-2001, 04:29 PM

no, no...i think there should be a system that takes the win/loss ratio and makes it a percentile, thus proving who has the most wins/loss's, i still think we should have these points, but they shouldnt mean anything.

steventhebol · 12-07-2001, 04:40 PM

the frigggen ranking system hmmmmm.........how many agree that you shood get at least a 100 points a game if you beat someone under your rank.

Token · 12-07-2001, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Quote: from steventhebol on 7:40 pm on Dec. 7, 2001
the frigggen ranking system hmmmmm.........how many agree that you shood get at least a 100 points a game if you beat someone under your rank.

that would defeat the purpous of it...just scrap it all together, its horrid and faulty.

steventhebol · 12-07-2001, 04:51 PM

well ok

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bring back the old days... - Bring the flo~	LocalMotion	New features	12	06-13-2005 03:48 AM
Ranking system	EvilAkuma	New features	12	05-22-2004 05:17 PM
The ranking system...	coolkilla	General Comments and Strategies	24	05-17-2004 09:43 AM
Project x aoe2 ranking system	TarkanX	General	10	01-05-2003 10:17 AM

12-07-2001, 03:55 PM	#2
Selvin Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 3,349 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	I think we should remove this one, don't bring back the old one, but bring in a system where it is done by winning percentage, butyou can only be on the list is if you play 25 games atleast, and you have to play 30 games at least per week. __________________ http://free.7host02.com/astro75/signatureSelvin2.gif

12-07-2001, 04:03 PM	#4
Selvin Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 3,349 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	Do you mean we should remove it copletely, make it higher or make it lower?? __________________ http://free.7host02.com/astro75/signatureSelvin2.gif

12-07-2001, 04:09 PM	#6
Selvin Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 3,349 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	So are you saying after you play 25 games you could stay up there for life?? (#### I hate the bugs on this forum. It says I have one reply.) __________________ http://free.7host02.com/astro75/signatureSelvin2.gif

12-07-2001, 04:40 PM	#8
steventhebol Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: home Posts: 813 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	the frigggen ranking system hmmmmm.........how many agree that you shood get at least a 100 points a game if you beat someone under your rank. __________________ http://www.marvel.com[br]hahaha! I put the marvel in marvelous! Death awaits you so step foward!!

12-07-2001, 03:44 PM	#1
Token Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Your house Posts: 383 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	the only support youll get for this system are from people who suck, or cant win unless its really laggy. the old system required you to win, and play, this one lets any old person get lucky and be in the top spot, and then they say their hot shit, and they lost cause of lag. its a horrible system, too faulty. the other one, of course, wasnt perfect, but it was much better than this new, unstable one. meh, who agrees? i say we bring back the old one.

12-07-2001, 04:29 PM	#7
Token Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Your house Posts: 383 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	no, no...i think there should be a system that takes the win/loss ratio and makes it a percentile, thus proving who has the most wins/loss's, i still think we should have these points, but they shouldnt mean anything.

12-07-2001, 04:51 PM	#10
steventhebol Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: home Posts: 813 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): 0 Thanks (Received): 0 Likes (Given): 0 Likes (Received): 0 Dislikes (Given): 0 Dislikes (Received): 0 Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	well ok __________________ http://www.marvel.com[br]hahaha! I put the marvel in marvelous! Death awaits you so step foward!!