SFO Archive Forums - View Single Post - State of the union

Nantuko Joe · 01-31-2003, 11:21 PM

[quote

ost_uid0="princevegetam"]what a load of bullpoop. yes, it was stupid of the japanese government to not surrender, but what did you expect?! they'd conquered most of asia at that time and they were confident that america was going to be no problem. how could they have known that the U.S. had an atomic bomb?! in those days, 90% of the world didn't even know what a nuclear weapon could do, of course they're going to call the bluff. it'd be like iraq threatening to destroy the entire U.S. with some sort of new technology, would the U.S. surrender? #### no. and it was the japanese government who decided to not surrender, not all of the japanese ppl agreed with that. there were innocent japanese ppl who wished to surrender that died as a result of the irresponsible actions by the U.S.

you may have not harmed the jailed japanese, but what you did was an act of discrimination and racism. they were prejudiced against in the jails and you flipin know it. even the U.S. has admitted what they did was wrong so there is no argument here, what the U.S. did to it's own citizens with japanese heritage was WRONG.

and that crap about the iraqis being killed by their own leader's bio/chemi weapons is a unconfirmed. unless you can show me some solid proof from a media source that is not of american nature, it is unsubstantial evidence. and assuming that the empty chemical warheads had chemical weapons is not good enough. it is an assumption which could be wrong. stop coming up with a poopload of theories, give me some real proof.[/quote]
However, after being bombed ONCE and being threatened that we had two more laying in our reserves, they SHOULD HAVE SURRENDERED! They had seen the devastation that one of them did at Hiroshima. We told them they'd hit them again. They ignored us. They brought it upon THEMSELVES.

The camps we forced the japanese into during WWII pacific were totally necessary. Once again, WE WERE AT WAR WITH THEM!!! We could not afford the liability that one or a group of them could be suicide bombers or sleeper agents. It was a necessity.

Oh, so just because it's an american source means that it's really unconfirmed? What a load of bull########. If YOU want the information so badly, then YOU go look it up. What country do you live in? Go to your frigging library and look up articles on it. I don't have the time to dig around because some 14-year-old on a XMvsSF thinks he's smart.

01-31-2003, 11:21 PM	#26
Nantuko Joe Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Right behind you... Posts: 1,479 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[quoteost_uid0="princevegetam"]what a load of bullpoop. yes, it was stupid of the japanese government to not surrender, but what did you expect?! they'd conquered most of asia at that time and they were confident that america was going to be no problem. how could they have known that the U.S. had an atomic bomb?! in those days, 90% of the world didn't even know what a nuclear weapon could do, of course they're going to call the bluff. it'd be like iraq threatening to destroy the entire U.S. with some sort of new technology, would the U.S. surrender? #### no. and it was the japanese government who decided to not surrender, not all of the japanese ppl agreed with that. there were innocent japanese ppl who wished to surrender that died as a result of the irresponsible actions by the U.S. you may have not harmed the jailed japanese, but what you did was an act of discrimination and racism. they were prejudiced against in the jails and you flipin know it. even the U.S. has admitted what they did was wrong so there is no argument here, what the U.S. did to it's own citizens with japanese heritage was WRONG. and that crap about the iraqis being killed by their own leader's bio/chemi weapons is a unconfirmed. unless you can show me some solid proof from a media source that is not of american nature, it is unsubstantial evidence. and assuming that the empty chemical warheads had chemical weapons is not good enough. it is an assumption which could be wrong. stop coming up with a poopload of theories, give me some real proof.[/quote] However, after being bombed ONCE and being threatened that we had two more laying in our reserves, they SHOULD HAVE SURRENDERED! They had seen the devastation that one of them did at Hiroshima. We told them they'd hit them again. They ignored us. They brought it upon THEMSELVES. The camps we forced the japanese into during WWII pacific were totally necessary. Once again, WE WERE AT WAR WITH THEM!!! We could not afford the liability that one or a group of them could be suicide bombers or sleeper agents. It was a necessity. Oh, so just because it's an american source means that it's really unconfirmed? What a load of bull########. If YOU want the information so badly, then YOU go look it up. What country do you live in? Go to your frigging library and look up articles on it. I don't have the time to dig around because some 14-year-old on a XMvsSF thinks he's smart.