View Single Post
Old 01-31-2003, 10:58 AM   #27
Selvin
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,349
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Selvin Send a message via MSN to Selvin
Default

Just wondering, the threats are coming out of Iraq along the lines of:

"If you attack/invade Iraq, we will destroy/break the neck of America."

Now, if Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction, how would they do this?? They would need a huge army to do so, and even though, it would be near impossible to destroy a country as big as America with an army now-a-days.

I do believe Iraq and the weapon inspectors should be given more time (like 3 weeks), but I do disagree with some of the posts against America.

If America was doing this for world domination or something along those lines, I think it would be smarter to go after some first world countries instead of a third world country.
Selvin is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04053 seconds with 14 queries