View Single Post
Old 01-30-2003, 09:15 PM   #22
Nantuko Joe
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Right behind you...
Posts: 1,479
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Nantuko Joe
Default

princevegetam: There is so proof that they have weapons, or did Desert STORM and Desert STRIKE not exist in your mind? And if they don't have weapons of mass destruction, then how did they mysteriously use chemical and biological weapons to kill 1.5 MILLION of their own people. And the warheads were EMPTY, but they were EMPTIED, as in, they had previously contained chemicals. They have the weapons, we've seen them on numerous occasions, and EVERY TIME we go to investigate, Saddam kicks us out of the country. Then when he lets us back in, they're mysteriously gone. Hmm...

Yes, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings GOULD have been prevented: if they surrendered. They didn't. We bombed them once. They STILL didn't surrender. We told them that if they didn't surrender, we'd hit them again. Guess what? They refused again. They brought the second bomb upon themselves. And as far as the japanese camps? We were at war with them. We could not take the chance that there could be sleeper agents in the US, or suicide bombers. Plus, we never harmed or killed them when they were in the camps, we just put them there to keep tabs on them.

And notice how once the Japanese surrendered, we released them.
Nantuko Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.06550 seconds with 14 queries