View Single Post
Old 01-29-2003, 01:51 PM   #32
Nantuko Joe
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Right behind you...
Posts: 1,479
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Nantuko Joe
Default

[quoteost_uid0="iTALY"][quoteost_uid0="blossom"][quoteost_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]I'm all for it. 9/11 showed us that if we don't strike first, we'll be the ones being hit. And we only meddle in the affairs of other countries when their actions would threaten the US or our allies.[/quote]
i agree with Joe maybe we should strike first.
if not we run the risk of being attacked and loosing some of our friends and family members to an attack that could have been prevented.
[/quote]
and what about the people living in the other country's?? they are thinking the exact same thing as you guys, we should attack first before they attack.....[/quote]
Because they attacked us first, and without ANY provocation. Therefore we went in and kicked their ass. But 9/11 showed us that if we don't attack first, we'll be hit again. We NEVER go in and blow up a country for no apparent reason. Therefore, unless they majorly piss us off, they don't have to worry. Iraq has majorly pissed us off. therefore, they've got to worry.

And unless they pull off another suicide bombing in America, they can't hit us.
Nantuko Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04700 seconds with 14 queries