View Single Post
Old 01-29-2003, 01:48 PM   #8
Nantuko Joe
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Right behind you...
Posts: 1,479
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Nantuko Joe
Default

Quote:
nantuko: and how can the US know he desarmed the bombs ?
i mean if you didn't even found any trace of the bombs, then how can you know he have some and worst if he has, how can you he didn't desarmed them ?
Karma: we have SEEN his bombs back in '91. We have SEEN his bombs in '93. We have SEEN his bombs in i believe '98. When we went to inspect them further, he kicked us out. We have SEEN his bombs a few weeks ago, when we found the warheads. He HAS them, we've SEEN them.

Quote:
disarm?!
thats stupid!
no country is stupid enough to disarm themselves!
you need to rephrase your sentence...
disarm the weapons of mass destructions but not entirely all their weapons!
btw, you speak as if Iraq is the only country who have nuclear weapons
what about your country
dont you have the same?!
Bloodpack: The US is responsible with our nukes. We have NEVER used a nuclear weapon on another country. Iraq, on the other hand, has killed 1.5 MILLION!!! of his own ppl testing nukes, chemical weapons and biological weapons. Saddam poses a threat to the ENTIRE WORLD, and therefore should not have nukes. The US does NOT threaten the entire world, WE are responsible, so we get to keep ours. Same as the UK. Same as France. Same as Russia. Same as Italy. They've all got nukes, they've NEVER used them against another nation (or their own), so they're responsible enough to keep them.
Nantuko Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.05571 seconds with 14 queries