stupid 2000warrior, assuming you're so umm.. thoughtless, my last post was just a mere compliment to all your contributive posts to this topic i started.. thats all :angryfire:
even a little kid could understand that..
i read your posts and i'm intrigued.. but dang, i have to go college now (man i come online oftenly just before i go and just before i leave college: weird ??? )
ok ok.. i will add my posts soon.. honest i will.. i think 2000warrior has become too precious of this topic.. but i'll have to jump in soon because i believe i have all the facts and files to my disposal which will make you understand properly.. 2000warrior, joe and all.. you're doing great with the back up of your quotes but i think its time you let me hop in.. lol!!!!!!! :buttrock:
ps: as a scientist myself, i just would like to add that iraq does not pose any threat at all according to the lack of rescources it contains! the possession of weapons of mass destruction are CRYSTAL CLEAR in north korea..
reason why america failed to act against that "obvious" threat is unknown.. but i can assure you.. this war is not for the possession of oil.. you can consider another big difference..
anyway seeya guys, definitely post in the "best posts" soon..
chow :alien: