SFO Archive Forums - View Single Post - Street fighter vs. dragon ball(not counting gt....

Nantuko Joe · 12-10-2002, 07:29 AM

[color=green]Chill out dude. I was using Shin Bison as an example. This is what I'm trying to get across...

You're correct in saying "Enma would NEVER do such a thing, blah blah blah, blah blah blah". It's all true, but only under NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES. In the true DBZ storyline, then yes, Enma would not revive someone unless it was a life-or-death situation.

However, under normal circumstances, would the sides of good and evil in Street Fighter be fighting alongside each other? Would they just say "Screw our lifelong feud, let's get DBZ!"? No. Would Goku NORMALLY be fighting alongside his worst enemies? No? Would Street Fighter characters even be fighting against DragonballZ characters? No?

Now, in this debate, it's ALL of the Street Fighter characters versus ALL of the DBZ characters. Each side wants to win, and can and will do anything possible to help their side win. Enma is a DBZ character. Sure, he wouldn't normally revive someone unless the circumstances are dire, but at this moment, in this debate, he's fighting WITH the DBZ characters, and AGAINST the SF characters, and for the purpose of this debate, will do ANYTHING to help the DBZ fighters the win. This includes resurrection.

If there was a SF fighter who only used a special attack in extreme, sake-of-the-world situations, would you include him in this debate? Even if it would win you the debate?

Enma, for the sake of this debate, is like any of the Z fighters. He's fighting alongside them to destroy the enemy. If constant resurrection would help the Z fighters to the win, then so be it, he can do so. But you can't say "he wouldn't do it in the DBZ storyline, so he can't do it here," because if that were the case, then you could also say "Buu can't fight alongside Goku, because he wouldn't do it in the DBZ storyline."

12-10-2002, 07:29 AM	#732
Nantuko Joe Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Right behind you... Posts: 1,479 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	[color=green]Chill out dude. I was using Shin Bison as an example. This is what I'm trying to get across... You're correct in saying "Enma would NEVER do such a thing, blah blah blah, blah blah blah". It's all true, but only under NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES. In the true DBZ storyline, then yes, Enma would not revive someone unless it was a life-or-death situation. However, under normal circumstances, would the sides of good and evil in Street Fighter be fighting alongside each other? Would they just say "Screw our lifelong feud, let's get DBZ!"? No. Would Goku NORMALLY be fighting alongside his worst enemies? No? Would Street Fighter characters even be fighting against DragonballZ characters? No? Now, in this debate, it's ALL of the Street Fighter characters versus ALL of the DBZ characters. Each side wants to win, and can and will do anything possible to help their side win. Enma is a DBZ character. Sure, he wouldn't normally revive someone unless the circumstances are dire, but at this moment, in this debate, he's fighting WITH the DBZ characters, and AGAINST the SF characters, and for the purpose of this debate, will do ANYTHING to help the DBZ fighters the win. This includes resurrection. If there was a SF fighter who only used a special attack in extreme, sake-of-the-world situations, would you include him in this debate? Even if it would win you the debate? Enma, for the sake of this debate, is like any of the Z fighters. He's fighting alongside them to destroy the enemy. If constant resurrection would help the Z fighters to the win, then so be it, he can do so. But you can't say "he wouldn't do it in the DBZ storyline, so he can't do it here," because if that were the case, then you could also say "Buu can't fight alongside Goku, because he wouldn't do it in the DBZ storyline."