SFO Archive Forums - View Single Post - About the new rule of 2kwarrior...

asshole · 11-27-2002, 02:03 PM

Warrior, no disrespect, but I think it's a stupid rule also. You said "No reviving under no circumstances", what if someone wants to bring one back for memories? Or... someone wants to bring it back because they have a real good/important comment about it? I know you said to link it, but would you rather see a new thread startd saying "This comment is about that thread on page 69", instead of just reviving it?

So, I think yer rule should be modified a bit, I think it should say "No reviving if it's useless!"

Oh and Thanks Karma for starting this thread.

11-27-2002, 02:03 PM	#3
asshole Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,729 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	Warrior, no disrespect, but I think it's a stupid rule also. You said "No reviving under no circumstances", what if someone wants to bring one back for memories? Or... someone wants to bring it back because they have a real good/important comment about it? I know you said to link it, but would you rather see a new thread startd saying "This comment is about that thread on page 69", instead of just reviving it? So, I think yer rule should be modified a bit, I think it should say "No reviving if it's useless!" Oh and Thanks Karma for starting this thread. __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v135/XxElPeCaDoRxX/zorade.gif[/img:sig_uid] I don't put my heart on women, I put my hard-on on women!