View Single Post
Old 07-14-2002, 09:39 PM   #81
SSJKarma
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada somewhere in the province of quebec
Posts: 5,445
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via MSN to SSJKarma
Default

thru i love akuma,ryu,KEN not for their style of fighting but most for their personality (real dif between them)

I VOTED FOR DAN HIBIKI THE ONLY SHOTO WHO CAN BEAT THEM ALL INCLUDING THAT CRAPPY AKUMA YOU ALL SAY !

RYU, AKUMA = same stupid thing except that akuma has electric TATSU MAKI SEMPU KYAKU and FLAME SHORYUKEN.

Ken = different, final point !
why, different normal moves (see that any button press for ken is way dif than ryu or akuma) special are almost the same but has some slight dif. supers, definetely different (he doesn't shot out a beam like others, he prefer his fist against beam users ! his SHORYU REPPA can past thru all beam attacks ! am i right on this ?)

anyway, seeing it like that... you can say that ken is dif. enough to not be considered a clone and be another char that would need an other strategie than ryu or akuma users !

now DAN HIBIKI IS THE RIGHT CHAR... thru i know he will probably be the last char to be in the game since anyone in here probably doesn't know how to play him, so they consider him a useless char !

at least DX ZERO and I thinks otherwise !
i'm pretty sure that TarkanX, Dan HIBIKI and other vets that play more than one char in a fighting game know hoe to play him too and all knows that he is more than a funny looking guy, but he is a good fighter when right played !

conclusion:
VOTE DAN HIBIKI !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://membres.lycos.fr/imagesforum/Banner.gif[/img:sig_uid]
"How did you escape my grasp ? no matter, i'll crush you now !" -DB : Lost Soul
My Web Site
http://membres.lycos.fr/xmvssf/
SSJKarma is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04659 seconds with 14 queries