[color=#000000]
Quote:
I already mentioned euthanasia if you bothered to read my posts VF. This is why I don't reply to your posts because you constantly skip/not read my and other peoples posts. =/
I EVEN REPLYED TO THAT POST! It's not my fault you debate in such a wierd way where as I don't know what you're responding to in each little paragraph. Adopt the quote style. It's easier.
Quote:
Anyway, for those who may not know what euthanasia is:The act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment.
So what you're saying is it's okay to kill a homeless dog, but it's NOT okay to kill a KNOWN KILLER?
That's like me killing you instead of me killing Charlie Manson. It's a completely stupid concept in every way you look at it.
10,000 were euthenised last year because they didn't have a home. Pitbuls are knwon to kill, mame, brutaly attack and more than anything else bring pain to those who are near them, but NOOOO. Don't go killing them! Why? Because your boy friend has a pitbul.
If it wasn't for that, and you had no personal affection for pitbuls and someone would bring you the facts, 50 kids killed last year or so and so was attacked, you would say "Yeah, why not?"
So, again, so summarize YOUR position, killing 10,000 homeless dogs = FINE, killing known killers = "NOO DONT KILL THEM!".
I wonder how society would work if that was implimented.
Quote:
And I'll say it again. I believe that euthanasia is okay. If an animal is suffering or in pain and it can't be helped, it is alright to put it down. ALSO, I've learned that they don't just use euthanasia on homeless dogs. Shelters try to give them homes first. If no one takes them in after a while, then they do it. I believe that is alright.
Do you know how dogs are put down? An injection, totally painless. How do you think your pitbuls will be putdown? Rusty chainsaw to the neck? No, the same way they kill all dogs, injection which puts them down painlessley.
BUT NOOO. You'd rather have hundreds of little kids die untill you alow your little pitbul get an ounce of needle.
Quote:
There is more than one way to end pit bull attacks. They can make a law were people have to take dog training classes and get a license to own a pit bull breed. This way, the dogs will be raised properly and will be less likely to attack people if the owners know how to handle it.
Let me tell you something about pitbuls. From what we've seen, one attack can end a life.
I have three little dogs. Yeah, they've bit me like once, but it didn't hurt, because they were small. It's in the dog's blood. Even if you train it, even if it's a super smart circuss dog, it's still going to bite you. Usually, they try when they're small.
But when you have a dog like a pitbul, one bite can end your life. One bite to the leg, jaws locked, and your leg is gone and you're left on the floor to die. No other dog can do this, but the pitbul can, AND THE PITBUL HAS.
BUT NOOO. You'd rather have hundreds of little kids die untill you alow your little pitbul get an ounce of needle.
Quote:
Also, as part of the law, they would need to take their dog to a vet every few month to check for any behavioral changes and such. This would be a good idea because their will be a higher demand for vets and dog trainers, which will create more jobs for people. Not to mention, it will make people think twice before getting a pit bull. Only those that truly have their heart set on a pit bull will go through the lengths to acquire one.
And you really think people will go through that trouble just to get one of those ugly dogs? No, they'll just have them, sell them, keep them, or give them away to other people. How will the government know you have one? It won't. Nuff said.
AND IF THE GOVERNMENT DOES CHECKS, they take the pitbul, AND THEN WHAT?
It gets taken to the vet, where in a week, it's killed.
[quote]I don