View Single Post
Old 07-23-2005, 12:58 AM   #60
Windarossa
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 483
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Windarossa Send a message via MSN to Windarossa
Default

[quoteost_uid4="Zpower"][color=#000000ost_uid4]Actually Pit Bulls are very dangerous animals to own as pets. Basically they are really over aggressive making them more prone to attack being people or other animals. Secondly these dogs are very athletic and strong especially in the muzzle area. Now these traits would be somewhat ideal for a dog owner, yet these Pit Bulls share a common killer trait which is their extremely high aggression normally found in wild animals. Does this really call for a state wide ban on the Half Bull Dog and Half Terrier killer? I think that is the right decision. Since it would be only a matter of time before another one attacked or killed another person. Why take the risk?[/colorost_uid4][/quoteost_uid4]
[color=#810541ost_uid4]Understandable. But what about the pit bulls that saved peoples lives and stuff. Don't they get some sort of credit for being good dogs?[/colorost_uid4]
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Restavega/contest.gif[/img:sig_uid]

Punish the deed, NOT the breed!
Windarossa is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.06081 seconds with 14 queries