05-14-2005, 07:43 PM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: --> East Los Angeles, California c--
Posts: 3,047
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
|
Quote:
hunting
yes you can use a bow and arrow, but a gun is more efficent
Are we living in hunter-gatherer times that we need to hunt out food? No, we don't. We're living in the post industrialized world and there is a ready source of food in and urban, sub-urban and rural area.
Hunting is for game, for show. It's not a necessity unless you're stranded in the woods, in which case, why on earth is it you haev a gun?
Even if there is a population of people in the united states that needs hunting to survive, WHICH THERE ISN'T, does that justify the 31,000 who die each year?
If I invent a new toy which kills 30% of the surounding populice in a one mile viciinity, should it be legal just because I enjoy it?
No, we need to balance the scale. In this case, guns are a problem, not a good thing.
Quote:
cars
yes you can use a horse and buggy, but a car is more efficent (as in faster efficent, dont want to start an environmental debate)
Who cares? what does this have to do with the debate? Quit nit picking single phraises in my posts and attack my argument, not cars. (?)
|
|
|