View Single Post
Old 04-23-2005, 02:50 PM   #44
dominicankid098
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,430
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via MSN to dominicankid098
Default

There's a big difference between playing in the NCAA and HighSchool.

Where Lebron James played in highschool, had ALOT of great highschool teams.

Here is my example of why I like this rule..

Comparing Lebron's district highschools with a district that does not have a very competitive district..

Lebron averages in his district for example 26.7 ppg 8.7 rpg 7.8 apg..
Kid in a very low competitive district averages 27.6 ppg 8.3 rpg 7.9 apg..

Now if you compare them both, they are statistically about equal players.. But yet we don't see how competitive the districts are..

It is hard to keep up with thousands of districts. I beleive every player should goto college before they step up to the NBA.. College can teach you some things that prepare you for the NBA. If some of these people who came out of highschool had some college experience, then they would be much better players.

You can't compare Highschool games against NCAA, because the weakest NCAA team would own the crap out of any highschool team. NCAA recruits the best and strongest out of all districts. Then they put them to play against each other..



And like I said before. How hard is it for a kid in a weak district whos 5'7 in a highschool team, shoot the ball 15 times through the hoop and average 30+ points per game yet named one of the best out of highschool when someone else in a really good district is averaging 25.7 ppg?




Edited By dominicankid098 on 1114293105
dominicankid098 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.05334 seconds with 14 queries