04-22-2005, 10:53 PM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: --> East Los Angeles, California c--
Posts: 3,047
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
|
[quote  ost_uid0="SirViper"] please enlighten me and show me another way... and yah i know the render is kinda big... its for an SOTW themed racing... so i just made that more in the focus and effects around it... but if you have another way to make sigs, please show me, i just cant think for other ways other then your whorish pic+bg+text. btw my text wasnt the focus... in my sotw we need to include our name so i jus hid it small in a corner... i didnt want it on it cuz i wanted the car and the effects around it to be the focus.[/quote]
[quote\so anyways if the pic+bg+text is a bad thing, can you show me another way to make sigs? is mayb your sig better? lots of text and 2 colors...[/quote]
Well, I guess mines is sort of better since it did wn this forum's best sig, and only uses two colors.
And instead of using pic + text + bg, add poop, add poop, add poop.
The more, the better.
Don't make it busy, but make it varied. Don't just add those three things, maybe if you don't want to brush, manipulate a pic to make it look like brushing. Add line art, maybe "tech", some shapes, and for a background, instead of being a texture, which is what you're been doing alot (and some "brush" blotches here and there), make it a scene, since effects tags are growing in popularity.
Again, you're constructing your mind to these three steps instead of trying new things and keeping us entertained. This might have been deamed "good", maybe a year ago. Now, it's just generic, old and boring.
and you don't need to make a paragraph long, godly written comeback post, just take the damn critisism.
|
|
|