SFO Archive Forums - View Single Post

~Mastermax~ · 02-10-2005, 01:15 PM

i just don't like this idea either, just as restavega said.

i mean why should the loser get an advantage thats not fair, just because someone sucks doesn't mean the game should be better for them, and a lot of supers can get you down past 50% health, so how powerful should this be, for one it shouldn't give the loser the upperhand after it's done, then there's a power unbalance and it's all outa wack.

02-10-2005, 01:15 PM	#18
~Mastermax~ Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Fetus of God (it's a level from darkstalkers, smartass!) Posts: 1,983 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	i just don't like this idea either, just as restavega said. i mean why should the loser get an advantage thats not fair, just because someone sucks doesn't mean the game should be better for them, and a lot of supers can get you down past 50% health, so how powerful should this be, for one it shouldn't give the loser the upperhand after it's done, then there's a power unbalance and it's all outa wack. __________________ [img:sig_uid]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/AllYourBaseAnimated.gif[/img:sig_uid]