View Single Post
Old 05-18-2004, 10:17 PM   #11
SSJKarma
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada somewhere in the province of quebec
Posts: 5,445
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via MSN to SSJKarma
Default

ok, you guys know nothing about the internet and that is what is making you believe in this kind of poop !

i received about 15 times th esame letters telling that if i had sent that, some couple would receive like 10 cents per emails sent and that some company would trackt he emails down !

but fact is... unless it was sent on the company's server there was no way for th ecompany to track every single emails we people sent ! as there is now ay for them to tell that one email form another unless they can read the content of it which they can't if it 's not on there server !

that prooves that it is simple spam made for you to actually say what you just said little one !
thus you played int heir games and you sent that information which cannot be true to the rest of the people !

and contrary to what you say, it is a chain letter !
want a description of a chain letter ?

here...
- CHAIN LETTER -
A letter sent to an house, which ask for the resident to send it to at least a few other people.

that's exactly what you did !
you wrote this here and hoped we would send it to others !
so this is basically a chain letter which is purely spam cause there is no way that it would help her/him even if it was real, the people just got played !

hope this helped you understand more and i hope it will hopefully help stop the junk mail from coming to our address !
__________________
[img:sig_uid]http://membres.lycos.fr/imagesforum/Banner.gif[/img:sig_uid]
"How did you escape my grasp ? no matter, i'll crush you now !" -DB : Lost Soul
My Web Site
http://membres.lycos.fr/xmvssf/
SSJKarma is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.05226 seconds with 14 queries