SFO Archive Forums - View Single Post

DA_VIPA · 05-03-2004, 11:00 PM

well i think their shud be a new system for the ranks.. i reckon we should not get no points for tag or a seporate rankin system for tag ppl an a seporate one for the non tag players, and instead of giving 10 points + half the difference for beating someone above you, you should get a fixed rate of points because the ranks move up an down so quick that it just dont make sense whats the point in winning a 100 games in a couple days and you get surpassed by a guy who only beat a guy above you once or twice doesnt prove anything but the fact that things need to change in this part of the game.

05-03-2004, 11:00 PM	#5
DA_VIPA Senior Member Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: ...haha u cant find me Posts: 2,364 Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given): Thanks (Received): Likes (Given): Likes (Received): Dislikes (Given): Dislikes (Received): Points: 0 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)	well i think their shud be a new system for the ranks.. i reckon we should not get no points for tag or a seporate rankin system for tag ppl an a seporate one for the non tag players, and instead of giving 10 points + half the difference for beating someone above you, you should get a fixed rate of points because the ranks move up an down so quick that it just dont make sense whats the point in winning a 100 games in a couple days and you get surpassed by a guy who only beat a guy above you once or twice doesnt prove anything but the fact that things need to change in this part of the game.