|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Points: 0
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
|
Quote:
SSJ Karma
completely false !
ok, lots of invention were created in a good causes and ended up used for bad purposes, want me to name a few...
the ATOMIC BOMB !
the TNT
and the likes !
if these weren't mistakes, man, then i don't know what they were !
we are a foolish speci who wants to rule the world by being the only speci who can think like we do. that you cannot deny. it is the law of survival. a law of nature that all living thing do. so why, wouldn't the human race be good in any sens !
The human race itself, however, is NOT an invention.
kester said that according to science, our species is a mistake. This is false. Some of the CREATIONS that were developed by our species are mistakes, but the species itself is not a mistake. No one and nothing INTENDED to create humankind. We are the result of evolution, natural selection and morphological change over millions of years, as are every other animal specie on the planet. None of them are "mistakes," and neither is the human race.
Quote:
example, if scientifics would tell you that they have the cure to all desease in existence by simply swallowing a pile, and then they are prooving it to you, by testing on a subject. would believe them just because they prooved it to you or would you be sckeptic even tho they have prooved it to you ?
That makes no sense.
Let's say a human has every disease known to man ravaging through his or her body at the same time, and by some miracle of medical science, was able to survive for a short amount of time. If a scientist were to say "this vial of medicine has the power to cure the world's diseases," administered it to the patient, and the patient was cured, then yes, he would be correct. The medicine would indeed have the ability to fight off all the world's diseases, and it would be considered fact.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but if such a thing happened as I exampled above, then I would be a firm believer in this medicinal concoction.
Quote:
so how can science be all good and facts when even the scientist themselves are still fighting off each other ?
my point is clear here... science do not proove anything since it is man made theories. nothing more !
From a scientific standpoint, the same can be said about religion...all it is is man-made theories, and nothing more. Therefore, religions cannot be good.....according to your outlook on science.
Quote:
and i didn't bring it back to religion, it was a comparision !
you say science is prooven because millions of people study it. then why aren't religion prooved when millions study it as well !
No, that's not what I said.
I said science is proven fact because all the theologians could argue with each other over which religion is more accurate, but they would never get ANYWHERE, because there is no proof to support ANY of their claims. Jews cannot agree with Buddhists. Catholics cannot agree with Celtics. Muslims cannot agree with Hindus. Meanwhile, science IS capable of bringing proof to the table. While men from africa can argue religious beliefs with people from india or japan, an african scientist, indian scientist and japanese scientist can all agree on science.
Do you see any scientists disagreeing over Newton's Laws of Motion? Nope. What about Einstein's Theory of Relativity? Nah uh. The equations used to figure out chemical bonds during chemical reactions? I don't think so. Astronomy? Not to my knowledge. And they all agree because proof has been brought to the table in order to enforce the ideas.
THAT is why science is considered fact. Not simply because millions of people study it, but because millions of people study it AND experiment with it AND prove it. Millions of people study religions, but they do not question it. They do not test it, they simply study and follow without question. That's why science is considered fact and religion theory.
Quote:
you still didn't answered my question tho...
who told you 2+2=4 ?
if you answer humans, then tell me how this was prooven to be true ?
Humans.
It was proven true by, say, taking two apples and putting them in a bucket with two more apples. You will then have four apples.
Two, four, eight hundred fifty thousand.....they're just words to represent something bigger. Instead of being One-Two-Three, it could have been Argh-Bleah-Yeach. But the principle is the same. We just created words that are used to represent values. But the values are true constants, because they've existed even before we discovered them.
Quote:
(ShinKu Ryu)
We were never apes...i can now say dat scientistare not as smart as i thought
Someone that can't even correctly spell two words in a 16 word sentence saying that scientists aren't smart......
Like I said, if you're not going to debate, then don't post. You have no proof that we were never apes, nor can you even begin to fathom a guess, because you're uninformed. You're just acting off personal opinion, which, in a scientific debate, is worth absolutely nothing.
Quote:
kester_
just because i dont beleive evolution doesnt mean you have to bite my ass off. geez
No, I'm "biting [your] ass off" because you're making incorrect assumptions about theories that you're misinterpreting without providing sources or proof, then simply saying that you're right even after I proved you're wrong.
|