View Single Post
Old 03-24-2004, 03:03 PM   #36
Angel-Eyes
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,655
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Send a message via AIM to Angel-Eyes Send a message via MSN to Angel-Eyes
Default

[quoteost_uid0="Shauku"]kester_, this is a debate. What you just did is NOT debating.

First off, you are claiming to contain more knowledge of the matter than the people who wrote your sources. And you say that my ideas are ludicrous.

Secondly, I never said I didn't believe your sources, because you never even cited any. I said your final "theory" did not make sense, and ASKED for a source. Therefore, I ask that you give me the source of the theory you attempted to use in your final "point."

Third, you made a false interpretation of a scientific law, and I corrected you. If you believe I made a mistake in correcting you, then give me reasons. You cannot simply say "i did not interpret the 2nd theory of thermodynamics incorrectly." YOu need to provide reasons for WHY you think you did it correctly. If you don't, then your argument becomes null and void, because you are incapable of supporting it.
[/quote]
just because i dont beleive evolution doesnt mean you have to bite my ass off. geez
Angel-Eyes is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04680 seconds with 14 queries