"Hear one side, and you will be in the dark; hear both sides, and all will be clear"------------Haliburton
I havent read any posts opposing evolution so I think I should tell the other side of the story.
First off I would like to correct myself: I said "evolution" , but it should be called "the theory of evolution"
I will not use the Bible as a source because you will just say its not scientific, so I will use science to prove "science" wrong.
ok heres my debate, please read it all:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that "in all energy exchanges, if no energy enters or leaves the system, the potential energy of the state will always be less than that of the initial state." (also known as entropy)
In other words: energy degenerates.
The theory of evolution completely contradicts the 2nd law! :laughlong:
---------------------------------------------------------
next point:
Lack of physical evidence.
all the evolutionists have is some fossils that they say are 4 billion years old. BULL CRAP!
the fossils that they have found ( no matter how old they say) are clearly separate species and not a half way monkeyman. THERE IS NO MISSING LINK.
-------------------------------------------------------
next point
Logic fallaceis
just think about it.......................ok are you done?
just as I though, LUDICROUS!
------------------------------------------------
next point
Mathmatics prove it wrong
according to the evolutionary timescale the earth is approximately eight to ten billions of years old, that is the equivalent to 1020 or one hundred quintillion seconds.
according to the same theory there are approximately 1080 atoms found in the universe. even with these astounding numbers, it is highly unlikely to achieve odds such as 1 in 103,000,000 the same odds that a scientist named Edward Huxley estimated to be the odds of a horse evolving, let alone the chances of more complex life such as humans.
---------------------------------------------------------
Verdict
just as other theories have been subject to rigorous standards in the past, evolution must also be subject to the same testing. due to the logical fallacies, mathematical impossibilities and the abundance of physical evidence contrary to the theory of evolution it cannot be either plausible, nor believable
well there you go, i didnt even have to use the Bible as a source.(dont get me started on that)
IF YOU SKIMMED MY POST, RE-READ IT NOW.
--------------------------------------------------------
bottom line
Darwin must have had malaria or somthing while he was on the Beagle :laughlong:
|