View Single Post
Old 10-07-2003, 02:28 PM   #45
LancerPX
Member
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Points: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default

[quoteost_uid0="TarkanX"]STfuPip, everyone hates 4 Player. If you like it, then you're a rank hungry bum. 4 Player was bad period, and even TMyApp and Lefty agree with me, ask them. 4 Player was the down point in this game, not just for me, but for many other players, even *****s.[/quote]
i know u wouldnt lie about tmyapp and lefty agreeing with you about that they think 4 player mode was bad from the beggining....

let's say tmyapp does keep 4 player mode...

he should separate tag mode and 1 on 1 mode in two different servers...(one on ooscanoo and one on Big Bertha)

Since ooscanoo always breaks and has alot of chat lag...tagmodeshouldstaythere*cough*
and good skill 1 on 1 games should stay on Big bertha (the server with less chat lag)

also since two modes would be seperate on this idea that i have, then there should be two different rank systems...one for cheaptag mode players and one for 1 on 1 players (then we will know who's doing good on 1on1 games)

^ Now i know that is a pretty damn good idea ^

-the only thing i didnt like about sept.2001 is low punching people to death...*mvc2sucks style* and hopefully if idea would come to work ...1on1 mode wont have *low punch of death*

BUT ANYWAYS AFTER ALL I SAID:

i still wouldnt want tag mode in the game period becuz i dont like it and i want everyone to think about Group Elimination Play and Group Match play being the future of sfo...*but if its gonna be as laggy as tag mode..then forget it*
__________________
Dominicankid098....DominicanGod2k2....Stillmatic.. ..LancerPX

CALL ME WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT!
LancerPX is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.05748 seconds with 14 queries