SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   New features (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Variable attack - blue room - My opinion (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=9903)

raidus 09-21-2002 10:12 AM

I think the variable attack time should be shortened... people can stack the odds with that to extremes. If people dont already put the good players on their team, they then set it to level 3, start teh game, attack once, use variable and then kill 1 player. Other than the player not getting to play the 1 player left on that team is helpless and left for dead. Also if the variable was shortened, not so many people would be getting such high ranks so fast, because they couldnt rely on the 1 hit kill... I think it should be shortened so you can get in 1 supercombo each and a couple fireballs or something... or if you cant do that, reduce the damage of supercombos when it is in teh blue room? Is that possible?

QUIET_KILLER 09-21-2002 10:34 AM

[quote:post_uid6="raidus"]I think the variable attack time should be shortened... people can stack the odds with that to extremes. If people dont already put the good players on their team, they then set it to level 3, start teh game, attack once, use variable and then kill 1 player. Other than the player not getting to play the 1 player left on that team is helpless and left for dead. Also if the variable was shortened, not so many people would be getting such high ranks so fast, because they couldnt rely on the 1 hit kill... I think it should be shortened so you can get in 1 supercombo each and a couple fireballs or something... or if you cant do that, reduce the damage of supercombos when it is in teh blue room? Is that possible?[/quote:post_uid6]
I hope no one just comez into this thread and flamez on him for a asking a ? ok.Think fo yallz flamez.2000warrior Would you like to answer this.I am sure you can give us a answer as well as that mr SSjkarma. :DAlso If you think about mr Raidus the variable was made for a few reasonz.Tmyappz and the other modz would not have it there if they did not want it.I also think you need to just practice some more and you will be like oh ok this is fun if itz 1 on 1 or whatever you would like.Itz not that bad just give it a lil more time thatz all.If you master any of your practice and master your skillz.Then you can wait for pplz to attack you then Reverse it on them.I love trying to Imagine the look on pplz face when I do that. :D :0

machine1 09-21-2002 11:06 AM

variable attack be shortened? never!!

Roll 09-21-2002 11:34 AM

I agree, it should be shortened.. although, lag makes it longer sometimes, so....

machine1 09-21-2002 11:46 AM

ur outta ur mind. it only last 10 seconds anyway 10 seconds is short enough!

ScorpionX 09-21-2002 12:07 PM

I agree with you radius.Alot of the players that call thereselves the best use this.When they do it they get in like 3 or 4 supers.Their variable attacks last for like 1 min when they supposed to last only seconds.Its like a higher level of cheapness.It should be reduced.

machine1 09-21-2002 12:08 PM

its only 10 seconds if it last longer u experiening a bug or lag..duh :withstupid: 10 seconds is short enough

ScorpionX 09-21-2002 12:22 PM

[quote:post_uid0="machine1"]its only 10 seconds if it last longer u experiening a bug or lag..duh :withstupid: 10 seconds is short enough[/quote]
Thats the problem there is always lag and the variable attack it self will create even more lag which causes it to last longer than it should.

machine1 09-21-2002 12:49 PM

then stay away from laggers i guess :biggrin:

Ludacris 09-21-2002 06:55 PM

[quote:post_uid0="machine1"]then stay away from laggers i guess :biggrin:[/quote]
yeah or just deal with it.........I know sometimes it's hard cuz they always do it but it's all part of the online game.......


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.06185 seconds with 13 queries