SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   New features (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Team battle - 3on3, but not tag team (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=9539)

Dreadlocks 11-14-2003 02:46 PM

you know how some games like SFA3 or Tekken have those 3on3 battles where each character takes turns fighting 1on1 until someone dies, then the next person comes in to replace them, and you keep going until all 3 team members die, then the other team wins. It's not a bad idea. Since it's only taking turns 1on1, there should be no lag, and it would be the coolest thing to try to add unto the game.


P.S. what ever happen to my "changing marve|" topic in the Genernal Comments section?

Nferno666 11-14-2003 11:30 PM

well 3 on 3 was mention along time ago and tmy said no to it cause it would cause way more lag that normal

SSJKarma 11-15-2003 12:37 AM

well, he said no tags, which means not all 3 at the same time which brings up the lag excuses to a minimum, cause its still true that the game will be affected by the number fo player on the server !

but the true way to say no to this, is by the example given below...

EXAMPLE:
you're playing the match, you're 2 in line and you fight newbs and the likes. but you're second and by that you have to wait for the first guy to be defeated, but he never is. so you waited a whole 15 minutes for nothing. and the game is finish there is no more opponents to fight.

see, that would make the game boring and not many would play this.
people in tags already wants to play a lot and aren't even staying in the fights if they cannot fight because of stupid guy who can't tags !

why would they want to take the chance on this mode ?
its just insane to wait that many time just to not fight at all !
now i made the example for a second player in line, now imagine the third one, believe me this is a very bad idea for a multiplayer play. but would be good for single player tho !

Scaggs 11-15-2003 02:38 PM

That is true but what Dreadlocks said does said kinda fun.

Ousha!
Scaggs :D

Nferno666 11-15-2003 04:03 PM

yeah but what if the others on your team don't have the patients to be waiting for there turn to come in or what if it never gets to be their turn because 1 guy finishes off all 3 on him own :D sure easy pts but i'm sure they wanted some action

alamgir 11-16-2003 07:10 AM

Do u mean like team battle?

sjc2199 11-18-2003 06:38 PM

[quote:post_uid0="Dreadlocks"]you know how some games like SFA3 or Tekken have those 3on3 battles where each character takes turns fighting 1on1 until someone dies, then the next person comes in to replace them, and you keep going until all 3 team members die, then the other team wins. It's not a bad idea. Since it's only taking turns 1on1, there should be no lag, and it would be the coolest thing to try to add unto the game.


P.S. what ever happen to my "changing marve|" topic in the Genernal Comments section?[/quote]
i know what youtalking abuot, you mean somethingl ike King Of the Fighters right, that's a great idea because it will cut down on lag, so the play may be way more smoother

ledmonkey 11-18-2003 06:48 PM

6 ppl.....Like a 2v2 match with 2 observers......Lot's of bugs....Lot's of lag...

Nferno666 11-18-2003 07:42 PM

well why would you want to let ppl observe...that's why if your gonna let some1 watch it should only be 1 person...2 at max but no more than that...plus many observers get bored and leave like 2 minutes after watching

milestails 11-18-2003 08:06 PM

Team battles?... No, I wouldn't say it was a good idea. It would slow down lag yeah... But if a very good person is in front... That's where the problem is... *Sigh*... :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.06619 seconds with 13 queries