nantuko: and how can the US know he desarmed the bombs ?
i mean if you didn't even found any trace of the bombs, then how can you know he have some and worst if he has, how can you he didn't desarmed them ?

be realistic one second... BUSH wants to go in WAR just to be sure the country don't have bombs !
there is no WAY to prove he has the bomb just like there is no way to prove he could have desarmed it !

you know why i know that for a fact...
because it is called TRUST, which the US doesn't give, so when something happens then it always considered a prelude to a war ! which result in a loss of a major population !

again, US are the worst country of them all in ARMY, you always want to go in war with other countrys for what ? their natural ressources and the fact they "SUPPOSELY" got NUCLEAR BOMBs (which you have in profusion) !

so i say, if your country is all GOOD for others, then why is it the only COUNTRY who SHOULD have THE RIGHTS to have some ?

my guess...
WORLD DOMINATION !
that's all the US try to have !
everything for themselves !

i agree, most of the countrys are like that, but why has the US the right when other countrys don't ? that's still very selffish for me !

[quote:post_uid0="Nantuko Joe"]If Saddam Hussein refuses to disarm his weapons and get rid of them, we're going to war.[/color][/quote]
disarm?!
thats stupid!
no country is stupid enough to disarm themselves!
you need to rephrase your sentence...
disarm the weapons of mass destructions but not entirely all their weapons!

btw, you speak as if Iraq is the only country who have nuclear weapons
what about your country
dont you have the same?!

**look whos talking :plain:

ok i getting tired of u.

War, bombs,Iraq, and fighting....thats all I hear on the Tv and in the newspaper....I sure miss the good old days when everyone got along...oh wait, that never happened..

heh...

bush's pretty clever, at first he talks about how he's gonna help the ppl in africa from HIV to soften ppl's hearts and suddenly switches to terrorism talks, this way ppl will see him as a kind person and accept the U.S. going to war as a good cause. not bad.... but a little too obvious

Karma: we have SEEN his bombs back in '91. We have SEEN his bombs in '93. We have SEEN his bombs in i believe '98. When we went to inspect them further, he kicked us out. We have SEEN his bombs a few weeks ago, when we found the warheads. He HAS them, we've SEEN them.

Bloodpack: The US is responsible with our nukes. We have NEVER used a nuclear weapon on another country. Iraq, on the other hand, has killed 1.5 MILLION!!! of his own ppl testing nukes, chemical weapons and biological weapons. Saddam poses a threat to the ENTIRE WORLD, and therefore should not have nukes. The US does NOT threaten the entire world, WE are responsible, so we get to keep ours. Same as the UK. Same as France. Same as Russia. Same as Italy. They've all got nukes, they've NEVER used them against another nation (or their own), so they're responsible enough to keep them.

hmm... interesting since i seem to recall that the U.S. used an atomic bomb on japan?

and italy doesn't have nukes.

only the following countries do:

Britain
China
France
India
Pakistan
Russia
United States
Israel (possibly, unconfirmed)

[quote:post_uid0="princevegetam"]hmm... interesting since i seem to recall that the U.S. used an atomic bomb on japan?[/quote]
I seem to recall that too :biggrin: Nagasaki and Horoshimo...(Yes the spelling is horrible) :biggrin: