And so is the U.N.

but this isn't about another War thread. Nope.
It's the War Pic Thread!!
yiiiipeeeeee

btw: I had my American monkey type englis fo me :D


http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/bush_is_hitler.jpg

http://firmament.ibt-one.de/rayaan.d...essamerica.jpg

http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/bomb....jpgb30809.jpg

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...2/fc7a8e09.jpg

well some of those pics are funny but life isnt...

:lol: Thats funny stuff.. lol..

Funny but scary, Hitler rules with an Fear and power, how is bush different? ???

Well, lets compare for a moment.

-Hitler gained power politics.
-Bush gained power politics.

-Hitler was "givin" a Chancelorship by someone who thought he'd be weak.
-Bush won the election.

-Hitler was givin the executive power to "deal with communists."
-Bush was givin the executive power to "deal with terrorists."

-Hitler had 20,000 jews, political opponents,and communists murdered on his first day of this new power.
-Bush had a few thousand muslim and suspected terrorists put into prison without proper charages.

-Hitler advocated and preached to people's worst fears and angers. He used this propaganda to turn the already present anger of the German population against Jews, France and the Allies of WWI, and Communism.
-Bush advocated and preached to people's worst fears and angers. He used this propaganda to turn the already present anger of the American population against terrorists and anyone he says are affiliated with them.

-Hilter used a military tactic called Blitzkrieg, a form of "lightning" fast attack that used aerial bombardment, tanks, and vehicles to achieve its swiftness, destroy resistence and cause the enemy to give up hope of fighting.
-Bush is using a military tactic called Shock and Awe, a form of Blitzkrieg rip off that uses a fast attack with aerial bombardment, tanks, and vehicles to achieve its swiftness, destroy resistence and cause the enemy to give up hope of fighting.

However, if you look closely enough at those, there's plenty of differences... namely the fact that Hitler pursued to feed off of people's worst fears for conquest of ALL Europe, and constantly found scapegoats to eradicate (jews/communists).

However, the BIG difference here is while one has to keep the population at close to 50% in agreance with his actions, the other could dominate the population by impossing a military facist dictatorship and just kill off all competitors for the chancelorship/presidency.

SaddamHussein: I made a topic a lot like this a while ago... if you look through the past topics you might find it.

Where the government and rulership differ the men stay the same.

Hitler started on his own and worked up and when he was in power what he said goes. that was his character what made him who he is, bush is the same.

They are alike, yet bush's action are on a smaller scale... For now.

Do you think I don't know that? And what chance do you think Bush would have of actually pulling off a stunt of militarily controlling the nation like that in one so firmly built on democracy as the US?

Sure, his actions (as other presidents actions) could lead the US a WWIII, but even in that event, he won't have absolute power.

Remember your checks and balances? Nobody is checking him in Congress right now because they're all afraid of losing public support... that's exactly why he's getting his way for now. The moment you see Bush trying to pull off his own holocaust, there will be tens of millions if not over a hundred million people who will protest his actions, call for his impeachment, resign their positions in protest, refuse to follow orders in the military, and most certainly contest him with a rival politician.

Germany had 2 reasons it lead to a facist dictator.

1. The Treaty of Versallies left Germany in shambles, the Great Depression didn't do anything to help, and here's you a nice statistic, one American Dollar had a value of 6 million German marks at one time because of the kind of inflation that was caused. People were desperate... if you think that the 10% of Americans out of work during the Great Depression was bad, try looking at how Germany was doing at the same time. It was ENORMOUSLY worse. This is the first reason people started looking for alternatives for answers... someone who would restore the prestige of Germany to its pre-WWI condition.

2. Germany was a newly founded democracy. Hitler, although attaining his power through political means, quickly instated a draft and returned Germany to the military dictatorship many citizens were familiar with and trusted.

Right now, America has been a democracy for over 200 years and has the worlds strongest economy. If Bush were to try to rule the nation with the military, IMMEDIATELY there would be political opponents calling for his impeachment. Clinton nearly got removed from office over adultery, and that would be NOTHING as opposed to attempting to sieze absolute power and destroy the Constitution.

You're getting much too carried away with this war... Iraq is a 5th world nation, not something like France was, which had a military nearly the size of the Germans when it was invaded, and if its government/military had chosen to fight, may have repulsed the German onslaught with a hasty counter-attack.

But please, don't even take my word for it, watch a video clip of one of Hitler's speaches to his Nazi party. I've seen these before, and he accuses Jews, Communists, and the Treaty of Versaillies for Germany's condition. George Bush can't even rival that, and I fail to recall the last time Bush has advocated the extermination of a religious group, opposing politicians, and "weak, inferior" people of the Americas.

When he does make that leap, you can bet your arse he won't be around much longer.

When the government turns on religion (And believe me it will) Then we know things are going wrong.

Oh and by the way you write to much man :laughlong:

Neo_genic: This will be my last post here for tonight as I can see you're not even reading what I'm saying, so do me a divine favor and read this quote and caption carefully.

[quote:post_uid0="2000warrior"]
George Bush can't even rival that, and I fail to recall the last time Bush has advocated the extermination of a religious group, opposing politicians, and "weak, inferior" people of the Americas.

When he does make that leap, you can bet your arse he won't be around much longer.[/quote]

When the government turns on religion (and believe me it won't) then we know that person/group will not be in power for long.

Oh and by the way you comprehend to little man :biggrin:

Tuche' my friend Tuche'... :)