SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   New features (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   [ NEXT CHARACTER ] - official discussion (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10573)

TMyApp 12-31-2001 08:19 PM

Well, as you have all noticed (or guessed) there will not be any voting for the next character (this time).

Why you ask? Well, many reasons.

This has been LONG in development (a lot of the people around me (lefty) have been asking me to just "step in" and do this a LONG time ago) and finaly it has happened.

Some may like it, some may not. There is a good chance that this forum will be flooded with reasons of why it SHOULD have been Gambit, but, b4 we start that argument, lets just remember one thing... "it is done". No one can change it @ this point.

If you DO need those "reasons", just read some of the old threads. They are all in there (somewhere).

Scott... will finaly have a place in here. There is not much else i can say.

"Dreams don't die."

Selvin 12-31-2001 08:27 PM

You forgt to tell everyone it has to be an X-Men. My choice is Magneto, but if he is to hard to make then I go with Gambit.

Kahnol 12-31-2001 08:43 PM

Well, we could try to open up this discussion by analyzing the fighting styles of the existing characters. By having a character with a different style, the game would be more varied, and potentally more fun. We already know that an X-men member is likely, so we'd need to take that into account too.

(Edited by Kahnol at 12:44 am on Jan. 1, 2002)

DX Zero 12-31-2001 09:20 PM

rogue..shes perfectly useful and not so cheating :)

rocky 01-01-2002 02:55 AM




please do not make the ruubish of this forum by saying that the next chracter should blanka or another chracter which is not added in thexvvsf (specialy new bies)

i think the next chracter should :- would be

i dont like x-mens

i like street fighters



supersayian2 01-01-2002 05:46 AM

Quote:

Quote: from Selvin on 11:27 pm on Dec. 31, 2001
You forgt to tell everyone it has to be an X-Men. My choice is Magneto, but if he is to hard to make then I go with Gambit.
Magneto is pretty awesome when you do his special attack.

Akuma 01-01-2002 07:51 AM

You know, i could have swore that back when there was just Ryu....there was something i think it was in the FAQ saying that Cyclopes would be the next char. Then after that there would be voting for characters. Plus since he's TMy's favorite, it's only obvious that he would be next. But there's something else.....With Chun Li and Wolvie being more "up close" characters instead of fireball chuckers, i think Cyclopes is a perfect addition at this point (yes, i know chun li has a fireball but it's not her main attack obviously) to counter Ryu.


I have an idea, TMy. how about we vote on his player 2 color scheme? Personally i LOVED his black outfit from MvC2. It's just a thought ;)

And By the way, after reading the replys to this post it seems as if you people don't get that CYCLOPES IS THE NEXT CHARACTER.

(Edited by Akuma at 10:56 am on Jan. 1, 2002)

oO_HoTSauCeOo 01-01-2002 08:16 AM

H*** Nahhhh! Sorry but cyclops suxs period. He looks funny and he suxs like Sh**, sorry if it is offensive to people, but seriously he suxs like crap.
If there was a chose of characters, it would be akuma or gambit. Please but no cyclopsss. Thank you

Selvin 01-01-2002 08:17 AM

Cyclops looks funny!?! And I suppose wearing body armor and holding a staff 24/7 is how we should all live right??

Dan Hibiki 01-01-2002 08:22 AM

I think having Cyclops is great! He has more than enough moves... people can't (or better not) complain! Good luck on making his Forward to Down+2P super (aimed Optic Beam)! Combos can be possible with him, because it is as easy as hitting LK, LK, FK, FK!

And people, Cyclops doesn't suck. I think that there was a discussion on how it us the user that sucks, not the character in question.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.05880 seconds with 13 queries