Why don't we just hav a 2 on 1 aswell as a 2 on 1 TAG???

How *exactly* would that be implemented?

lol ... :biggrin:

i agree... i would like to hear more of this "new idea" :biggrin:

i think he means to have 2 ppl fighting another at the same time. like having 3 ppl fighting. 2 against 1.

I think that he means like, when you have a 2 on 1, its always 2 on 1 Tag (sort of), because the "1" still gets to fight using 2 players..

And he's asking for like, the "1" only gets to fight with just 1 player, instead of 2, so it'll REALLY be "2 on 1".

And he says to also keep the 2 on 1 Tag.


Understand?

And I admit, it's a good Idea, I've wanted this for so long..

isnt that like ..capcom vs snk?

That option's in there... If that's what you mean!

it's possible... but.. hardly seems fair...

the "one" would probably need about 200% health :biggrin:

it like if sum 1 wanted a really good challange. like say i wanted Nferno666 and TenchiX a 2 on 1 match. (i would so die....)

Actually, this would be great as a test to see how strong you are (in a way at least). It would be pretty cool to see how far you would go against 2 people (Say, Tarkan and Lord Cyris) before you lost, or if you're really good or lucky, you win.

GREAT IDEA !

after all, its like survival mode and those best player could prove once and for all that they are the best. plus, it gives a good challenge !

TMy, it's not a "not fair" situation, because the person thats the "1" is the one that chose this... right?

And yes, it'll be like the survival mode..
..to test your skill!

But, if it's too much work, just add it in the "to do list". :biggrin:

i wasen't asking u 2 do it straight away TMy. as ####### said. put it on ut 'to do' list if ur gonna add it that is...

yep, i like the idea, i thrive for challenges.

i think its a good idea, but most people would probably die. i think its a good idea that the 1 person should have ,i dont know, maybe... 150% health? (TMyApp: i think that if people would want to have a good challenge, they shouldn't have 200% health)

No No NO!!!

The "1" should still only have 100% health...

Survival Mode dang it.. think about it..

Or like the newer SF Games, make it that after one dies, yours automaticlaly gets about 15% health...
And also, like in the games, the opponents should come "One at a Time". Because Variables will kill anyone..

has any1 heard about lag?????
ok maybe what he meaans its handicapped matches
thats what he means
and anyways
lag would be impossible to fix

You can't FIX Lag.

And yes, we do mean Handicap matches, which is SAME THING as 2 on 1 (non-tag).

my bad
bugs and problems would be imposible to fix
why cant u call it handicap
####

well... the server/host would pick "who" gets to be "the one"...

but.. i suppose we (*cough*.. "we" ?? who am i kidding...) can make it so that ONLY player1 (host) can be "the one"

a had a similar idea to this whole thing a while back.. but instead of just being "the one", you would get to play one of the "boss" characters from the older games... such as Magneto from COTA (imagine taking on 2 people having his uber-boss powers/moves)....

now THAT idea seems fair to me (unless the host plays n00bs... *cough*.. and they dont stand a bloody chance against Barney.. let alone the great Magneto... hmm.. well.. in that case, perhaps the option would allow ONLY the non-host palyers to have the 'boss characters')...

well... just.. something to think about...

don't make so that only the host can be 'the 1'. cause sum people can't host

i.e. me

to tell you the truth ryuking i do not think that that is a good idea that is just an advantage.

actully...itz a challange. not an 'advantage'

and itz kingryu1 u n00b, not ryuking.

No, he's got a point. It is kind of an advantage. I mean, say someone enters a game. Then there are three people. Then the host decides to be mean, and uses the option to just kill the person. That is the advantage.

LoL,

MastaQ, RyuKing :D (LMFAO!!) Is right. It's a challange.

Roll: If the host is mean... then why dopesn't the person just leave???

They probably wouldn't want to be called chicken or something like that. And they might not want to lose points (you know how people are these days...) And how would someone know if someone is going to be mean? It could happen anywhere.