lol u sneak. that cool i would do the same thing if the movie was boring

Da 1st one was da best :buttrock:

This one was more actiony. There wasn't much car action though.

the first was the best !

like VIN DIESEL said himself:"i didn't sign up for a sequel as i didn't think a sequel could be made !"
even tho the second was good, i must agree, the first one was the kind of movie where there is no sequel to do, its a one time movie !

the second was more actions, but was less storywise. the thing is, its all about race in the first place, then why isn't it the same for the second one ? as simple as that, the sequel was good, but it was far from the first one, way far behind !

[quote:post_uid0="SSJKarma"]the first was the best !

like VIN DIESEL said himself:"i didn't sign up for a sequel as i didn't think a sequel could be made !"
even tho the second was good, i must agree, the first one was the kind of movie where there is no sequel to do, its a one time movie !

the second was more actions, but was less storywise. the thing is, its all about race in the first place, then why isn't it the same for the second one ? as simple as that, the sequel was good, but it was far from the first one, way far behind ![/quote]
ssj ifuget the dvd of 2 fast 2 furious, in the dvd it shows what happend after the fast and the furipous ended... so i suggest u get the dvd from blockbuster or something. then it shows howbrian got his skyline and then it goes to the races.

2fast 2 furious was good $h!t. the spped was real nice. at one point, i actually felt like i was driving one of the cars. paul walker and tyrese did they thing. they played out their parts well. ludacris was good too. the cars were nice like usual.

Ya the movie was the $H!T i thought it was very good ya and there were some sick cars :D

resident, in a world where DVD started to reign, you think i still watch VHS TAPEs ?

really,. i saw everything i needed to see, i looked at the movie a lot, a believe me, all people, except perhaps a few like me and a few like my father, looks at those movies for the story, and the second one wasn't much of a story.

how many of you here talk posted looked at it only for the awesome cars and had nothing for the story ?

believe me, the seocnd one if not for th ecar, is really not the same as the first, the first one is better ! at least it makes sens. the second one is like get taken by that guy and arrest him once you got all proofs, where are the so called RACE we had in the first movie ?

i tell you, no where.
so again, the first was awesome, the second was nothing !

i have the first one on dvd and it was cool!!! :buttrock:

it was cool i say yes?

I hope they make a 3rd one. Then that one will be a $h!t with those new car. That they will put.

it was ok not better then part one but good!!

i like 2 fast 2 furious better than the fast and furious.

plus it has tyrese in it!!!!!!!!!!!

but triple x was cool in the first one.

[quote:post_uid0="HELLOTHERE"]but triple x was cool in the first one.[/quote]
mrf....You mean Vin Dieasel....XXX was a character he played in a movie

i liked it a little

It had.......Ludacris in it to hes pretty cool to

I like the music that Ludacris made "Act A Fool", I even like the music video. wat do u say? That why 2 fast 2 furious rules.



Edited By EvilAkuma on Nov. 25 2003 at 11:49