![]() |
I'm sick and tired of all the web sting-noobs and optic blast-noobs. I'm sure many people found this game a lot more enjoyable before these characters came out.
The Old School version was scheduled to come out a long time ago, but never made it. So if it's possible to come out with an "Old School" version similar to the following suggestions, it would be greatly appreciated: 1. An old fashioned Ryu vs Ryu format as the game was when it first came out. With this format, no further problems could occur with marve| because Ryu was not created by them. 2. All features created up until Archive 2 (with Ryu, wolver |
they should proably change it to where ####(or anyone) can only do moves like optic blast and hadouken like every 5.3 seconds or something so cheapness will not be a problem.
|
I disagree...sure the cheap people are annoying. But I like have a diversity in characters. Though I myself dont care for akuma, chun-li, or sentinel..but some people use those guys. And since there are cheap players, taking away stuff wont really help..then can still be cheap with ryu. But sure, if we had 2 versions..the one now and the old version, that would be ok.
|
would the old version be on another site then?
|
Well.. that's a good point there.. but I doubt if there'll be a release of any "ol' skool" version.. I mean.. it'll just be a waste of time.. :biggrin:
Since you can always join a group of Ryu fighting Gs, host your tourneys, fight together and *cough* .. .well play together. The different beta releases of XvsSF or SFO all lead to a final release that would have all the characters needed to play.. so a Ryu only version just makes it very ol' school indeed... but I just don't see it happening. :biggrin: Then again.. anything is possible.. we just might see a release... cause I don't think it takes a lotta time. :biggrin: Edited By blanka09 on Nov. 23 2003 at 20:13 |
I agree with DanY.I'm tired of it to.
Edited By ApOcAlYp$e on Nov. 23 2003 at 20:15 |
[quote:post_uid0="ApOcAlYp$e"]I agree with DanY.I'm tired of it to.[/quote]
a lot of ppl is tried of it when is it going to stop!!! |
danY whay dont you just make you own site where you can only use ryu and akuma.
|
[quote:post_uid0="HELLOTHERE"]danY whay dont you just make you own site where you can only use ryu and akuma.[/quote]
good idea! |
stop your bitching people be thankful that we even have 1 version online compatabile only need shockwave stop
Complaining and be thankful that we have a Online game on the web :biggrin: enough said |
Alrite most of you apparently have only been here for a few months.
A while back TMyApp was going to make a seperate, playable version of the game, called the "Old School version." Meaning you can play the regular game AND the old school version. This production was delayed for some reason, and hasn't been mentioned since. |
yep... u'r tired of that.. and i'm tried of bitching :biggrin:
... there is a problem with the Old School verion... its... too old... :( we are talking pre-128bit cipher ... which means, it cannot work with our current chat servers... so why don't i just add that ?? well... its.. a lotta work... if i were to do that, i might as well fix/add a few more other features, remove all XvsSF title content (again) and add Akuma (everyone seems to like him.. right ?? ) ... i think that says it all... |
mainly because of the time tmyapp has to take for SFO ! and its also due to the fact that he is still wondering why you guys want an old stupidier version of this game ? sure many said it was way less laggy when it was only ryu vs ryu, but seriously tmyapp plays on a very limited machine himself and he still see these newer version a lot better and a lot less problematicks version of the old days of the ryu vs ryu time ! and i must say that i am wondering also.
as for the cheapness of the players, you want ryu only and you say its not gonna be cheap ? well as far as i remember, good hand to hand fights were even harder to find then then it is now ! say to yourself that with the lag will be getting with ryu vs ryu matches, that you'll get even more cheap players then you want them to be ! as back then, the only way to actually be sure hit, was by doing contless hadokens all the time, as the game didn't sync while supers, the game was an hell for FPS which made even a great machine get only a few FPS. and on that we hadn't had option for host or join, only quick matches. as if not enough, no more helpers, blocking bugs, speeding super bars and the likes ! so again, why would you want such a version ? *looks at fear tetsuo* really, that's the oldskool version that was asked a year ago ! sorry, that verison i don't want to see again, it was horrible compared to what we have now. Edited By SSJKarma on Nov. 23 2003 at 21:54 |
This version was mentioned in a site I was in once... All the features in it was interesting, and I've always wanted to play XvsSf from the time it was first put live. But sure people would get annoyed by cheap people but like marve| said, some people like them too. (maybe for their attacks...)
|
Im a vet..im all for it..i wasent around when the first version was released so..id like to see it..
|
well as much as i would want it back myself i'll have to agree with TMyApp...because it would be to much work and he would basiclly have to start from scratch cause of of those features were taken off and replaced and since he says it can't work with our current server that means we owuld have to find a *new* one that would
|
can anyone just answer my question please ?
why wuold you want to see a full of bugs and laggy as hell version to be back ? not mentionning the fact that 3/4 of the function here will not be there ! really, why guys ? |
well the game ran much better for ppl with slow comps back than...every1 was above 30 fps...now these days your luck to be above the 30fps mark
|
would it be possible to add on a feature where you can only host a ryu vs ryu game with all the features and the game engine of old school xmvssf? i know theres a quick game option, but could u make a 1 on 1 ryu server that would be just like old school mode? keep all thecontent but just make a ryu vs ryu only server that would play just like it did 2 years ago?
Edited By Lord-Oberon on Nov. 24 2003 at 11:58 |
[quote:post_uid0="Lord-Oberon"]would it be possible to add on a feature where you can only host a ryu vs ryu game with all the features and the game engine of old school xmvssf? i know theres a quick game option, but could u make a 1 on 1 ryu server that would be just like old school mode? keep all thecontent but just make a ryu vs ryu only server that would play just like it did 2 years ago?[/quote]
Yeah...that's EXACTLY what I would like to see. If it's so much trouble to come out with an Old School version, why was it announced to come out earlier in the year? Wasn't the prouduction worked on quite a bit before it was delayed? |
we should forgot about the old version and just work with what we have.
|
The old version isn't exactly gonna be that hard to make u know. Its only the smae game with less characters.
|
[quote:post_uid0="TMyApp"]yep... u'r tired of that.. and i'm tried of bitching :biggrin:
... there is a problem with the Old School verion... its... too old... :( we are talking pre-128bit cipher ... which means, it cannot work with our current chat servers... so why don't i just add that ?? well... its.. a lotta work... if i were to do that, i might as well fix/add a few more other features, remove all XvsSF title content (again) and add Akuma (everyone seems to like him.. right ?? ) ... i think that says it all...[/quote] mrf......a little more work than that alamgir Edited By ledmonkey on Nov. 24 2003 at 15:55 |
nferno666: really ?
then why was it the worst when i was playing with... AMD K6/2 500mhz (cpu) NVIDIA RIVA TNT 16megs (video) 128 megs ram by the way, tmyapp develops the game on a 500mhz with 16megs ram of video. don't know for ram itself. but that prooves it, anything under that is considered NON-PLAYABLE experience ! and its not me who says this. but tmyapp himself ! it didn't change, he told me this 2 years ago dude ! so really, he says it himself. the game runs much more smoother then it was back then. really i really don't understand why it run so poor today, but it sure aint his coding. the game works way better now then it was. want to proove it, i still have 500 plugged and i can still play it on it ! believe me, it works way better and i get even more FPS then it was before ! that's why i'm asking. really this game wasn't made to work on old computers under PIII 733mhz that's the least i can say. anything under that i really should give you the advice to get your computer up a notch ! and believe me, it took me 3 months to get up because of money problems, i don't have a job you know ! if i could upgrade, then so can anybody else ! i tell you, playing games on computers under 733mhz is just plain bullpoop now a days. its gonna be worth the upgrade believe me ! ALAMGIR: well, RYU only, no helpers, no 4P mode, no lag configuration options, quick matches only, no host / join options. the option for automatic background was chat command only, the intro was totally different and there was lots of old bugs. no more super jump lock (like it matters anyway) big FRAME PER SECONDS problems, by big i mean big big big FPS problems ! serisouly, from today to back then, lots and i mean alsmot all the program changed for the better ! i doubt him to even want to look at this old stupid version compared to today's work ! basically, what you guys ask, is for him to let go off a year and half work just to get some old excitement that you had ! don't know for tmyapp, but i would get outraged by the subtile way to say to him that you don't like the work he been doing for the last year and a half ! really... that's how i think your way of saying it is. you're basically telling him that. example: tell me the difference between both... - you worked your ass off for the last year and a half just to get so few things straight, bring the old game back cause its way better then this one ! or - i don't like this new version, get our old skool version back, it was better anyway ! really, i don't see any difference except that one is like less direct then the other ! and he said it himself, he call this... bitching ! so i still wonder why you want an old decripit version of a game that worked so harshly on the creators old computer compared to this awesome game he gave us right now that works way better on his old computer then it was 2 years ago ! Edited By SSJKarma on Nov. 24 2003 at 17:01 |
yeah the game didn't run so good on 500 MHZ but it was still about the 25fps mark on that...try playing it on a 500MHZ and the lest you''ll get might be 15...the game does need more CPU power than it did 2 years ago
|
ok, let me put this straight nferno666...
then why aren't you asking CAPCOM to make the game MvsC 2 on SNES ? is that ringing you any bell on the understanding of my way of thinking ? really, this game hasn't been made to be played under a 733mhz ! heck a 500mhz is the limit, that was what i was saying, tmyapp said that this version was optimized for old computers so they can load faster and get playing with faster FPS, if you don't get them, then its not tmyapp's program who got a problem, its your computer ! and i know what i'm talking about, cause i played this with everything between 133mhz and 1700mhz with many configurations. same thing always hapenned, the best computer always was better, at no time was it better on an older version ! except one or two times where i had better keyboard response, but other then that, graphics wise. the newest versions always defeated the old ones ! anyway, this is getting pointless... bringing back an old version would be stupid anyway ! TMyApp answered the guy, now this should be closed ! well at least i won't be speaking anymore ! |
Karma I'm not going to read all that rubbish so you should really just try summing your posts up into one small paragraph.
You REALLY would not know how the game functioned back then or nowbecause you rarely ever played and were never recognized for your game abilities. No offense big guy, but you're just a forum junky. |
:shocked: lol you just asking for it arent you dan :biggrin: i said i would reopen it because you said you still had something to say...and if that was it then i'll just have to close it AGAIN
|
HAHA no Nferno I asked a question to TMyApp a yesterday that he didn't answer...I'll requote it and include my response/question:
Quote:
If it's so much trouble to come out with an Old School version, why was it announced to come out earlier in the year? Wasn't the prouduction worked on quite a bit before it was delayed? Edited By DanYankees on Nov. 25 2003 at 18:57 |
it WAS suppose to come out last christmas along with sp
|
this is wat i think cause every month ppl start talking bout the same thing *take out tag mode* *bring back the old version*.....
tmyapp should make an Official Poll to see if everyone wants the game to have tag mode or no tag mode (just like he makes official polls during next character votes)...if the majority says tag then the game stays how it is....if the majority says no tag then the game changes and tag will not be a choice to play anymore... ---but...remember..tmyapp is the man so it is his decision if there should be an official vote on this...remember..it took him a lot of time to put tag on...alot of hard work fixing huge bugs and problems me personally would love the old skool back...i do agree on whoever said that fps was greater back then cause my game fps used to be on 36.6666 --> 33.6666---> ( ANOTHER NOTE ) People really wants tag off cause of the *cheapness of other users* and *the easy wins* tag brings to us...now are there ways to take off *cheapness from other users* and *the easy wins*... well if this idea of mine actually works...i think yes... People complained before that users would start games at level 3 and immediately destroy them with the variable attacks...then tmyapp took out the option ofusing level 3 and lowered it to level 2...now people start their games at level 2 and in 6 hadokens (which takes about 6 secs todo).. ppl would go rite to level 3 and and destroy u easily.... so wat i think is that there should not be variable attacks in this game....crossover isnt much of a problem to get away from...variable attacks is a HUGE problem especially to those idiots who use *web sting* on variable attacks continuosly.... so wat i say is take away variable attacks from tag mode...leave crossover attacks and maybe people would stop their complaining |
DanYankee, yet another proof of "how can you know something if i never heard of ya ?" don't know if you seet he stupidity in your last post about me !
like everyone else dude, i tryed all versions the day they came out ! and some days after them. really, believe me, i saw it getting better and better, but never have i found an old version that was better then a new one ! seriously, you think that because someone isn't known, that means he never played ? then look at the big picture dude, there is over 10000 users that play each days. i barely hear about 30 of them, so really how can you know all 10000 of them ? simple, old version is stupid. and the ryu vs ryu match only, why adding an option for that ? the guy you're playing, if he wants to play ryu vs ryu with you then you're ok. not like you didn't have any controls on anything hapenning in your servers now do you ! i played SENT vs SENT fights, SPIDEY vs SPIDEY fights and even chunli vs chunli fights, why ? not because the other users hapenned to choose the same as me, but because i asked him if he wanted to do a sent vs sent fight he answered yes and we did, so i ask, why adding an option into the game and making tmyapp do 50+ more hours of work on a function when that amount of time could be used to bettering the game ! as simple as that ! you think that what i say is rubish, i say look at your next to mine post, i don't see you better danyankee ! |
Sorry for working you up Karma. I didn't know you would be so offended.
I partly agree with dominicankid, but I doubt tag will be taken out. It's what makes this game unique. Next time, instead of having a character vote, maybe a vote should be taken on WHETHER we want a new character or not...because I'm satisfied with just Ryu. |
[quote:post_uid0="DanYankees"]I'm sick and tired of all the web sting-noobs and optic blast-noobs. I'm sure many people found this game a lot more enjoyable before these characters came out.
The Old School version was scheduled to come out a long time ago, but never made it. So if it's possible to come out with an "Old School" version similar to the following suggestions, it would be greatly appreciated: 1. An old fashioned Ryu vs Ryu format as the game was when it first came out. With this format, no further problems could occur with marve| because Ryu was not created by them. 2. All features created up until Archive 2 (with Ryu, wolver |
[quote:post_uid0="Lord-Oberon"]would it be possible to add on a feature where you can only host a ryu vs ryu game with all the features and the game engine of old school xmvssf? i know theres a quick game option, but could u make a 1 on 1 ryu server that would be just like old school mode? keep all thecontent but just make a ryu vs ryu only server that would play just like it did 2 years ago?[/quote]
lol welcome back lord.... :laughlong: :0 |
wrestlemania-
I'm suggesting this because it was scheduled to come out earlier, retard By the way nice double posts with absolutely useless content. Edited By DanYankees on Nov. 26 2003 at 12:48 |
watch the double posting...
|
I think there should be a description of the type of game thats going to play. Like whenever a person makes a game, if he/she sets it to 1 on 1 tag, then when people in the server click JOIN GAME, they'll see a little description under the name of the game, that says 1 on 1 tag, and if helpers are on or off, and the level it's starting at, etc.
Also I think instead of taking off variables, we can just have a option for them. Like the host can choose if it's ON or OFF. And this can also go under the description of the game. |
that would be agood idea jerry !
as for danyankee... well for what i see here, you don't care for other characters cause you already got your favorite one, but people lik eme like to diverse to have diversity in a game, and having one char isn't enoguh in a fighting game. we can also had the fact thatmany people here doesn't even have their favorite on right now, so they want it badly. how would you act if RYU wasn't there. really you can't ask for a fighting game to have only one character, it would be unconceivable ! but if you want, feel free to make your own RYU VS RYU GAME and call it www.RYUvsRYU.com ! |
[quote:post_uid0="Nferno666"]watch the double posting...[/quote]
its wrestle dude hes nots some ####. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%