SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   Banners, Avatars and Images (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Red and meth - Rate it! (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18618)

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 04:08 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...thRedSpek1.jpg
Rate it eh?

Z-z 07-31-2004 04:35 AM

focus on the bg man not the pic snd border 5/10

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 05:15 AM

Evaluate on what you just said please

Z-z 07-31-2004 05:16 AM

what im saying is spen more time working on the background
then take your time and do whatever you want with the picture :(

(-StarWarrior-) 07-31-2004 05:20 AM

the tag your trying to make is focus Of the picture
Oh yeah Z-z there is a border but you need glasses so bla.
Work on your background and use motion burr on the picture instead of burr everywhere....mtion has to be a 1 and only one.
Hope it helps...good try atleast.



Edited By (-StarWarrior-) on July 31 2004 at 08:21

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 05:23 AM

I did use motion blue, Lab-Monster told me to not do it as high, so i didn't and its hard to see, and the effect i was going for was to focus on the pic, obviously it worked :D, ive always done render backgrounds and it was good to make a change into brushing :alien:

LAB~MONSTER 07-31-2004 06:08 AM

Sweet dude, I already gave my ratings. All you need to hear is keep up the good work. lol. :D

(-StarWarrior-) 07-31-2004 07:59 AM

thats not brushing really...looks more like clouds.

Kingryu1 07-31-2004 08:28 AM

Ugly. All your tags are the same.

Lame BG, improve it, or just make a whole new one.
The line across the middle, horrible, doesnt blend AT ALL. Get rid of it.
Pic dont blend with anything, text, the line, or the bg. And the blur dont make it look good.
And the text. The gradient overlay makes it look bad, as does the emboss on the text.

Overall, just horrible IMO.

(-StarWarrior-) 07-31-2004 08:31 AM

:laughlong: go kingy!!!

hellboy666 07-31-2004 09:13 AM

cool. i watch there shows sometimes. 5.5/10

Virtual Fighter 07-31-2004 11:55 AM

pretty good, but for some reason im not so fond of your work.

at fist (when i saw the omega red sig) i was like "oh dang, that owns) ad now, its getting less and less thought out.

errg?

Scaggs 07-31-2004 12:08 PM

I personally hate banners that have rappers and stuff but a 6 over all.

neofunker 07-31-2004 02:23 PM

I give it a 5/10 ;)

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 03:51 PM

this is my least liked sig, i guess i shouldn't brush anymore, but uh some of you who critisized, go and do better than me you wankers

(-StarWarrior-) 07-31-2004 03:55 PM

i critisized and seems you need one more month of practice to get better....atleast to be a deccent tag maker...hack you think i'm worse then you since i critisized?

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 04:03 PM

Read my post...SOME of you, does not include you warrior, or virtual and some others, 1 month?...man ive been doin this poop for a year, hardly ever get bad critisiscm i find its only bad when i use brushes, so i will stop that, but most of you seemed to like my render sigs, but KingRyu made his point that he likes none of my stuff ???

(-StarWarrior-) 07-31-2004 04:10 PM

=/ i don't really like your "simple rendering" but atleat your trying to inprove....when www.battle-grounds.org/forum comes back on and register there.
You'll see all he comments and tips they gave you. It got me through a whole lot of crap...i think you should just try to read some of the usefull tips around here....not everything is good like when you said you used motion burr like at 5. Who told you that?...burr is used a base of a smooth background and then on the picture...
Peace Out.

Twiztid Tim 07-31-2004 04:13 PM

Lab said for me to lower the motion blur cuz he didn't like it or sumthin *shrugs* im making a ####anner now, lets see what people have to say when i post it



Edited By Twiztid Tim on July 31 2004 at 19:14


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.05517 seconds with 13 queries