[color=maroon:post_uid10]I did some serious thinking while I was banned from the community,an alot of reading through old topics made by members of this forum. I realized that alot of flamming and smart remarks have resulted in unneeded banning and ect.

I'm introducing in this thread a court like setting.(note:Like Judge Judy...just XMVSSF style).Most of the arguing is due to [b:post_uid10]ALOT OF MISCOMMUNICATING[/b:post_uid10].I can understand if some of you would rather not confront your problems,and deal with them in an unorganized rage.

[b:post_uid10]Set up for courtroom=[/b:post_uid10]

1.Do not post in this topic about closing it unless you are a mod or admins.

2.Do not reply unless it is your case.(Just view silently)

3.No flamming or [b:post_uid10]SMART REMARKS[/b:post_uid10].(Smart remarks being comments that will annoy judge or other officals.

4.Promise to tell the whole truth so help you.....(Your choice).

5.Name,an state your case.

6.Wait for a response from the judge.

7.Have [b:post_uid10]SOLID PROOF[/b:post_uid10] such as a link to that topic or snap shots of remarks in offical online chat server.

8.I will PM for my officals,an Lawyer's.(Ones that have been at these events,and are neutral parties....meaning they are on no ones side.

9.You may quit case whenever....your choice to avoid your problems.

10.What happens in this courtroom stays in this courtroom no discussion of this outside of this topic.[b:post_uid10]NONE....I'M SERIOUS[/b:post_uid10].Future discussion of cases outside of this topic may result in [b:post_uid10]OFFICAL BAN.[/b:post_uid10][/color:post_uid10]



Edited By SBYRD5 on May 02 2004 at 13:33

and you're the judge?

So do we just present some arguement that we're having with somebody else to you?

To tell the truth I would rather have someone like TarkanX as the judge,but yes unless someone like Tarkanx is interested.

Yes, Dan correct.

Well it is a good idea...if everyone agrees to do this, instead of what would normally happen.

Yes, I don't want to see any unneeded banning or flamming.

Let's prevent...instead of hint bad behavior among members

good ol' sbyrd's back, as sane as ever.

...I hope it is. This is perhaps one of the greatest things to happen in this forum, especially if used correctly.

not a bad idea, but...

this cannot work !
REALITY CHECK...
when someone will put something in here, another one will just come and DEBATE about it, and like all debates that i saw, it will always become a FLAMING topic. unless a mod stay in here and delete those flaming post. which will mostly never happen.

this will cause more hatred, i still think it is a good idea, but having a REAL JUDGE like a MOD is simply better cause they can maintain the lawin the court, which a normal user like you and i cannot do that and have to rely on people's common-sens ! which is asking for a miracle !

what do you think ?

PS: glad you're unbanned sbyrd5

SSJKarma, I'm working towards something here.

Yes, the fact that a debate will happen may produce it's self,but check the set up of the court to understand more.

I realized that a simple member like myself can't reach this goal alone I need the help of mods and VIP members.

PS:I'm glad also,an I want to make a change.

Sure, I'll be judge, though I have no powers, I could still report to the authorities...(by the way, judge Judy is fake, not to go off topic).

and just what would be the punishment or sentence to the convict ???

yeah, i think you have lots more power then you think TarkanX !

1 - you know the mod well, and they know you well !
2 - you can talk with them more then we all do ! (your their friend after all)
3 - your the living legend, who couldn't listen to you ? :biggrin:
4 - your such a figure of authority in here, you don't have the power to delete or powers that mods have, but you do have a power that i don't !

yep, your a good judge, can i be the DEFENDER's lawyers ?
:biggrin:

I wanna be a lawyer too!!!

i can be a lawyer.

the key to being a good lawyer is to have the silver tonuge.

gotenks u got what it takes?

this is a good idea too. tarkan would make a good judge, from what i hearing. but karma is right about this not working too good.......unless.....................nah he wouldnt just do it like that.

Defendant,and Plantiff must have lawyers from neutral parties.

Yes, Judge Judy is a fake show,but it does for fill the laughter wanted in court.

[quote:post_uid0="TarkanX"]Sure, I'll be judge, though I have no powers, I could still report to the authorities...(by the way, judge Judy is fake, not to go off topic).[/quote]
Sorry to go off topic but Judge Judy is fake?............damn anyway........

yeah I think it's a great idea but Karma is right........it's gonna end up in a flamin topic..........

Actually, Karma has a bit of a point, but that's what this thread is for. It's to solve problems, and arguments, etc.

heh...u can b lawyers or judge if u want
ill b d EXECUTIONER :buttrock:

Yeah! Welcome back Sybrd5! your court idea is great! we can go here to solve our conflictes and not get unecessary bans!

Sounds good to me.

Jsut like Roll sead this place is to slove problems and aruments here.. You'l see me in here alot....

[quote:post_uid0="SBYRD5"]To tell the truth I would rather have someone like TarkanX as the judge,but yes unless someone like Tarkanx is interested.

Yes, Dan correct.[/quote]
I'm willing to act as judge, too. You shant find somebody as impartial as myself very often. That, and I have strong administrative ties. Perhaps, if things get busy, Tarkan and I could split up the cases.

Just a thought... perhaps it would be wisest to have a new topic for each major case, and that this thread should be used to initially present complaints and such. Either that, or if TMyApp is feeling nice, he can make a new part of the forum to solving disputes peacefully.

<span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'>Dan hopes TMyApp is feeling nice...</span>

can i be a lawyer? or the jury?

[quote:post_uid0="KidKrazyShit"]SBYRD pmed me yesturday and asked me to be a judge.[/quote]
We are all doomed!!!!!!

Hey im a good political person, politics plays in all court cases. I can be lawyer, jury or a spectator.

I just want to be involved in some way. :biggrin:

I'm feeling mighty ignored here.

you're not dan, at least not by me, it's just that i will not refute a good argument ! :biggrin:

still, i think that without MOD POWERS, this court will gets ots of flaming and no one will be able to MAKE those PEST SHUT-IT UP !

agree tho, TarkanX and DAN have lots more power then the 3/4 of the members !
with them in as judges, we can still have a good time dealing with problems !
but remember...
* its a democraty, still... the president has the last word !
*Karma looking at TMYAPP*

Karma, exactly what power does dan have? :laugh:

No Dan--you're not going to be a judge. You're going to be my lawyer

I'm a lawyer?? Ew, I feel dirty already.

Listen, I'm sorry,but TarkanX has already gotten the spot of OFFICAL JUDGE,but in the unlikely event he is not here there will need to be another judge.KidKrazy seems to fit the take.These two are respected by mostly all,an have a nuetral understanding of things.(They both often don't take sides from what I've seen).I will pehaps ask Tupacwestsider to be the third judge.(There will be no need for more than 3 judges.

Lawyers, I don't assign lawyers that up to the defendent and plantiff who they want to repersent them.(Pick someone good don't get someone who doesn't know what the **** is going on).

Job Of Judge= To simply listen to the case,an ask for any form of proof,an conclude FAIRLY who is correct,an who is incorrect.

Job Of Jury= To just reach a verdict,and the WHOLE JURY MOST HAVE THE SAME VERDICT(answer).

Whoa... an xvssf courtroom? lol.. :biggrin:

Ok, where to begin...

Looks like a fine idea... as long as people don't go too "crazy" about their cases and keep it in a SFPOA-sort of seriousness.

I'll try to remember to moderate this thread whenever I remember... (which may be a lot less then I'd like too).

now your talking !
with 2kWarrior to enforece the law as a moderator.
without one, this wouldn't work hard enough !

SBYRD5: don't take it the wrong way...
TarkanX = ok for a judge ! but almost always take on one side, at least i saw him defending lots of player, including me ! he is not as impartiate as you think he is !

KKS = same as Tark !

your gonna have to be more precise then that.
no one is as impartiate as you want them too.
not even me, and i am trying everytime i do something.
when there is a problem between two member i know, i always try to calm them down and stay on each sides and believe me it is too risky to even get on that terrain !

i don't say Tark and KKS aren't good !
they are the best.
but so is DAN HIBIKI, so is 2Kwarrior, so is everyone else i have been knowing from the start up until now.
don't take it personnally, but i think DAN is way better then KKS !

still, this won't be necessary a lot...
i mean, all the REAL CONTROVERSY BAN, were like 3 in an entire year !

let me count...
YOU, SNAKE, SKATERFOX = 1 (yeah, you're in the same case as you were all involved)
TOKEN = 1 (got ban for saying to MUCH things)
errrr ? can't think of any other REAL CASE that would have really needed this kind of court.
that makes 2 out of 1 and a half year !

in lots of case, the ban isn't even permanent !
lots more people got unban after 1 PM or EMAIL including ASSHOLE. which mean the mod did take you lightly and didn't think you were that much needing a perm. ban !

look at it that way...
no real need for this !
tho it is a good idea, i think people will always use this to defend themself, even in a single grudge and things will get more annoying then helping !

sorry, but it's reality !

Well KKS and Tarkan(im not that sure about tarkan)might be impatient, but thats how a courtroom works sometimes as well. If the Defendant is really driving the judges patience then u know that the defendant is losing the case.

I really dont think that KKS or Tarkan will take one side in the court cases, because they themselfs dont really know the situation that well. And since theres going to be a jury and lawyers, The judges wont really have that much of a say in the courtroom. Jury will make the dicition and the Lawyers ask the questions and provide evidence.

So i would say..........

Just let the Judges stand as they are. Did you guys forget about Dan Hibiki? He was totally ignored.

read my post correctly tupac, i didn't ignored him. and i have already said his argument was good !

just tell me the numerus case that really would need this thing ?

not imaginary ones ok, the real ones !
except for TOKEN and the 3 guys from last weeks. there was no real case needing this kind of debate.
so i say, come back to reality, there s no need for this thing.

You guys totally forgot me.. :shocked: Well SBYRD5 if you need me I'll help out man. I also have strong ties to the mods. :biggrin: After all I'm on the dev team. :buttrock: