its ruined. all ruined.
http://a799.g.akamai.net/3/799/388/6...ws/1804417.jpg
http://www.msnbc.com/news/877972.asp

[quote:post_uid0="SolidSnake76"]its ruined. all ruined.
http://a799.g.akamai.net/3/799/388/6...ws/1804417.jpg
http://www.msnbc.com/news/877972.asp[/quote]
yeah I saw that yesterday man........that design is the ugliest one ever.........anyway....... they should have just build the old ones and had sumthin new I don't know........

Lol that looks funny. It looks like if it rained it all the rain would fall on the ppl and they would have to wash their hair even if they didn't want to. And y would they make it taller wouldn't it make it easier for terroist to attack it.

This design isn't a fashion statement,but more superior in interior design. This building design can take more damge than the original.

the key is engineering design, and ya dont understand that.

i explained too many times and i done explaining now. sum1 else do it.

here, i'll explain it...even though i don't live in the USA...


they made it that ugly so when the terriost tries to attack, i'll blind their eyes and make them stop... :laugh:

oh my god.

I MEANT HOW THE BUILDINGS WERE BUILT, NOT THE DAMN LOOKS U........U...........YA DAMN JACKASS. ur not even making sense. u never even seen a poster or a picture of the manhattan skyline have u?

this is the last time i doing this.

when the plane hit the building, the inpact blew right off important things to the building. as some of u may know, there was an outer are where the offices were and a core where the elevators and stairs were. in the north tower, the plane hit the core of the building and blew away the drywall surrounding the core. drywall. the idoits used drywall instead of concrete. and drywall may be fire-resistant, but fragile like glass when struck. the steel trussel held all 110 floor nicly above each other. what happens when they are exposed to heat? i mean extreme heat? they sagged and becamed weaken because the fire-proof foam that protected the trussel was blown away instantly by the planes impact. and once the trussel sagged, thats alot of weight bearing down on the building and as a result, the floors pancaked.

engineering flaws are one of the reasons why the towers collasped. using simple material instead of the strong stuff, idiots. i wish i was the chief engineer of construction.

ohhh....i thought you guys were talking about the ugly look.....sorry...my bad :laugh:

someone wanna tell me why they are making another one??? its just gonna be another easy target for people to blow up...

[quote:post_uid0="SolidSnake76"]its ruined. all ruined.
http://a799.g.akamai.net/3/799/388/6...ws/1804417.jpg
http://www.msnbc.com/news/877972.asp[/quote]
jeez. wats the point of wasting millions of dollars on sumthin that will just get attacked again. god, sum american ppl are so goddamn dumb. they just want it for publicity. not the memory of those who died. stupid america.

Just get on and live your life. Who cares what it looks like. Damn goverment doesnt give a fuc|< about the people anyway.

[quote:post_uid0="SolidSnake76"]oh my god.

I MEANT HOW THE BUILDINGS WERE BUILT, NOT THE DAMN LOOKS U........U...........YA DAMN JACKASS. ur not even making sense. u never even seen a poster or a picture of the manhattan skyline have u?

this is the last time i doing this.

when the plane hit the building, the inpact blew right off important things to the building. as some of u may know, there was an outer are where the offices were and a core where the elevators and stairs were. in the north tower, the plane hit the core of the building and blew away the drywall surrounding the core. drywall. the idoits used drywall instead of concrete. and drywall may be fire-resistant, but fragile like glass when struck. the steel trussel held all 110 floor nicly above each other. what happens when they are exposed to heat? i mean extreme heat? they sagged and becamed weaken because the fire-proof foam that protected the trussel was blown away instantly by the planes impact. and once the trussel sagged, thats alot of weight bearing down on the building and as a result, the floors pancaked.

engineering flaws are one of the reasons why the towers collasped. using simple material instead of the strong stuff, idiots. i wish i was the chief engineer of construction.[/quote]
no1 is even paying attention to my post.

so if u got beaten up out on the streets, would u ever leave ur house again?

sum1 said once before, 'if the same towers are not rebuilt, the terroist has won.'

I like that way but if it caught on fire all of it would catch on fire right.

u like it?

that is just a joke. what fool would think of building that?

wut da fuk is dat?/?....it looks like a jig saw puzzle

I still like it. it looks like big stairs it looks better then the one with the abstract building(the one that is at the beggining of the page)

This has all 7 proposals..

It's the first "related" link, right under the "video" section.

To tell the truth, none of those looked exceptionally safe, except maybe for "Group 3". However, knowing nothing about architechture, I'd love to hear more from SolidSnake76 on this...

its the way they building it, it looks its easy to burn down. it looks unguarded..

lets see what i know. and nakuto joe, please talk to mastaq, italy and kingryu1.

engineering is like an art. the building structure must be strong for almost anything. the former WTC were strong to resist earthquakes and plane attacks. now ya are wondering, if it was strong enough to resist plane attacks, why did it fall?
if it wasnt strong enough, why did it not topple? the problem was engineering flaws that made it weak to fire. as i said down here

now you want a good looking building. but not looking like a blonde. pple wouldnt want to go into buildings that look unsafe. it must have a good design and strong structural point to make a strong building. in san fran, the buildings are made to take earthquakes. so was the WTC, and when that bomb went off, pple werewondering why did it stand tall. the bomb was like a 5.0 or sumthing earthquake and it was suppose to take earthquake tremors big as 7.0, the highest. engineering takes aot of skill and what u pple dont understand is the strenght the building has. the WTC wasnt strong to the fire, and i hope thses idiots rebuild the same towers with stronger material.

so what if its attacked again, it will be stronger. its like getting beaten up on the streets. does that mean u let them win and never show ur face?

3 looks like a tic tac toe board but is ok. 4 looks ok. 2 looks like it shouldnt be made of glass. 5 looks the best to me large bottom to support stuff. And they should make it with more triangles since triagles are the strongest shape and the look pretty when you put them together. But 5 over all looks the safest.

The patriots....

damn it looks nice

maybe ya should read what Giuliani said. the former mayor of nyc.

no offense but terrorist won't try to destroy it because it looks funky :alien: j/k if they do try the security will be up the yingyang :laughlong: plus what kind of idiot would do the same thing twice, wait i mean three times (1989 bomb in building, 9-11) yeah also they'll prob. attack sea it's the only thing they haven't done

correction. february 28 1993. it didnt fall. and what the hell u mean 3 times?

3 times? yeah right,, i was bomb only 2 times. first time, i was bomb, bu it didnt go down, the second time, they got it good... his would never happen if dumb bush took this thing serious. As soon the said they r going to bomb it, Bush didnt take it serious, he though it was a joke..... ???