SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   New features (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   New type of rank system - Another type of rank system. (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10223)

Metal_Ken 10-29-2004 11:42 AM

Is it possible for us to get a rank system without people cheating their way to the top.

mastergrim8 10-29-2004 12:43 PM

no i dont think so. Because I know alot of people who cheated for rank 1. but keep dreaming

limbei 10-29-2004 05:58 PM

u can most probably elaborate on ur rank system first?
And similar topics have been brought up many times........ buT i guess the reason y they werent implemented, although SFO really needs a new, fairer rank system, was because such suggestions werent supported by adequate examples

Iplay2win 10-29-2004 06:37 PM

there's no easy way to make a 100% "fair" rank system

masterbob 10-29-2004 06:59 PM

for this type of game.... it would be hard
other less interesting games like those clicking rpgs would be a lot easier

5simon 10-29-2004 09:38 PM

hmmmm. maybe we can make some rank systeme like:

had a section TEST in the menu. the more test u do, higher rank u will be.

we can put test like:

lv1 easy : beat the dummy
lv2 easy : break the car in limit time
lv3 medium : beat ryu
lv4 hard : beat bison
........

can make up to 500 lv like this (this would be long)

hmmm. maybe 150.




Edited By 5simon on 1099111157

DarkstriderX 11-01-2004 09:31 AM

Your think'n way ahead of your time dude.. It cant be done.. as of now anyway.. :cool:



Edited By DarkstriderX on 1099330307

Master_AIK 11-01-2004 09:49 AM

i doubt it will happen, and that TEST would b very boring, and knowing people, they would prob find a way to cheat on that iswell...

68-1093009699 11-01-2004 10:02 AM

well instead of ranks we should have titles you know like how when moderators come in the server they have "(MOD)" next to their name well we could have somthing like that for us *except the sound* we could have the titles next to our name based on how many wins and losses like the average of those two numbers kind of like the grading scale they have at schools ....... like alright this is how it would be set up...

#### 29 and under wins
Rookie Fighter- 30 and under wins
Senior Fighter- 50- 70 wins
Advanced Fighter - 71- 99 wins
SuperAdvancedFighter 100- 130 wins
Master Fighter 131 - 150 wins
Master 151- 170 wins

you know somthing like that, kind of like the same way we have titles based on our pips in this forum :cool: except our wins number would be the number averaged from our wins and losses and then translated into a title....... if i knew how i would make a score board like how we have our piont system now.....i would :)




Edited By DarkKidbuu on 1099332208

y_09 11-01-2004 10:25 AM

how about just play the game more, that actually could help your chances of becoming one of the best ranked fighters in the game :biggrin:

68-1093009699 11-01-2004 10:42 AM

Hey howbout a little less of you being a smatass and a little more SHUT THE HELL UP!!!!

y_09 11-01-2004 10:59 AM

[quote:post_uid0="DarkKidbuu"]Hey howbout a little less of you being a smatass and a little more SHUT THE HELL UP!!!![/quote]
how about you just face the truth my idea was better than yours, and face reality your jeaulous, so stop acting like a ###got and accept it your idea ain't that bad but i don't see why the rank system should be changed when its fine as it is
:biggrin:




Edited By y_09 on 1099335606

Metal_Ken 11-01-2004 11:25 AM

U know how they use to have weekly tournaments in the old days to decide rank. They should start doing that again.

I remember when if a person won a special character or prize u could have fight them and if youwon u would win their prize from them.

for example if i fight ryusrevenge and beat him i would have won his golden ryu.

68-1093009699 11-01-2004 12:08 PM

[quote:post_uid0="y_09"][quote:post_uid0="DarkKidbuu"]Hey howbout a little less of you being a smartass and a little more SHUT THE HELL UP!!!![/quote]
how about you just face the truth my idea was better than yours, and face reality your jeaulous, so stop acting like a ###got and accept it your idea ain't that bad but i don't see why the rank system should be changed when its fine as it is
:biggrin:
[/quote]
Hey howbout a little less of you being a smartass and a litle more SHUT THE HELL UP!!

DA_VIPA 11-01-2004 12:29 PM

i think the rankin system should exclude tag fights.

Iplay2win 11-03-2004 06:08 AM

yea some of those people cheat on tag fights...The have 2 pc and put a "dummy" player on team 2 while the "real" person is on team 1 along with another real person.

if someone ever does this I'll just d/c the connection to lose sync so they'll leave and I'll reconnect the connection and I win (or we both lose)

imported_--(- 11-03-2004 06:39 AM

if the rank system should change it should be all about ur winning percentag instead of points

Iplay2win 11-03-2004 12:47 PM

[quote:post_uid0="--(-

imported_G 11-03-2004 01:25 PM

Yeah, the wannabe TmYapp,keep cheating when your about to win, he press the thing to get back in the chat, then he kicks you saying you left ,you left like a little bitch

coolkilla 11-03-2004 01:32 PM

Wdf is wrong with you people what who said that poop about a test if there was a test what if like 100 people all passed it then what they all be rank 1?NO! you can forget it...

@Darkkidbuu:Shut yo dumbass up do you realize how much work and time that would take for TMyApp too do that...Then you get mad at y_09 cause your idea was crap...

@Iplay2win:WDF? if the top scores was like that then you would have too never lose if you were rank 1 because if you lose once you wont be rank 1 anymore so WDF were yoooouuu thinking?..

@Ryder:What the hell are you talking about you fool uhh duuuh you can cheat even more if it went by how many wins you have cause you could still can get free wins...

@Da_VIpa:Yeah now thats a good idea tag mode should be excluded from the rank system so that people cant reset...gonna quote bob marley now...........

Quote:

-Nuff Said-

QUIET_KILLER 11-03-2004 02:51 PM

now where is this headed www.flameland.com
www.Ihopenot*sigh*.com they at it again :O

KenDaShoto 11-03-2004 06:10 PM

this one will get locked pretty soon

YokoX2.0 11-03-2004 07:14 PM

[quote:post_uid0="5simon"]hmmmm. maybe we can make some rank systeme like:

had a section TEST in the menu. the more test u do, higher rank u will be.

we can put test like:

lv1 easy : beat the dummy
lv2 easy : break the car in limit time
lv3 medium : beat ryu
lv4 hard : beat bison
........

can make up to 500 lv like this (this would be long)

hmmm. maybe 150.
[/quote]
I like it we shoud do that it is good. :ghostface:

imported_--(- 11-03-2004 07:47 PM

[quote:post_uid0="coolkilla"]Wdf is wrong with you people what who said that poop about a test if there was a test what if like 100 people all passed it then what they all be rank 1?NO! you can forget it...

@Darkkidbuu:Shut yo dumbass up do you realize how much work and time that would take for TMyApp too do that...Then you get mad at y_09 cause your idea was crap...

@Iplay2win:WDF? if the top scores was like that then you would have too never lose if you were rank 1 because if you lose once you wont be rank 1 anymore so WDF were yoooouuu thinking?..

@Ryder:What the hell are you talking about you fool uhh duuuh you can cheat even more if it went by how many wins you have cause you could still can get free wins...

@Da_VIpa:Yeah now thats a good idea tag mode should be excluded from the rank system so that people cant reset...gonna quote bob marley now...........

Quote:

-Nuff Said-
[/quote]
hey cuz who u calling a fool u the fool i said percentage u can cheat more on this cheap azz points stuff if its by percentage the it coutns on how many wins and lose cuz if i had 10 wins and 20 losses its 50% and if someone have 9/10 then they woould be a higher rank becuz there percntage is higher it makes more sence thencheap points that make rank system worthless


and yea it will start into a flamewar if h talk to me like that again or someone sees what he wrote and flamm his azz.




Edited By --(-

Iplay2win 11-03-2004 08:56 PM

[quote:post_uid0="--(-

imported_--(- 11-03-2004 10:20 PM

10 out of 20 is 50 percent

man idiot i fought 20 and won 10/ 10 is half of 20 and half is 50percent

Iplay2win 11-04-2004 06:21 AM

you said


Quote:

10 wins and 20 losses
that's playing 30 games

10 out of 30 is 33.3%

American_Badass 11-04-2004 06:33 AM

[color=#32CD32:post_uid2]Howbout we say that if youwin with spidey or cyclops or sent

u get one piont and when u win with ryu or akuma or chun or bison or wolvie u get 3!

That way stupid little kids like *onslaught* cant get there way to the top....not for awhile that is! :p[/color:post_uid2]

avilancer 11-04-2004 06:41 AM

[color=#FF0000:post_uid10]yo welll i personally liked coolkilla's idea that ur rank should only be decided by 1 on 1 fights :buttrock: and along with that the fight should only count if the helpers are off b/c i've seen some cheap azz wins b/c ur opponent got a "better" helper with a higher call #.

also i think that befor u start the fight there should be an option weather or not to put ur rank at stake so lets say that ur rank #1 but once u hit #1 and dont put ur rank at stake for ohhhhh say 7 days then your score will switch with the persons below u (in this case rank #2) and if yougo another week with out risking ur spot then ur score is switched with the #3 ranked person and so on. this way ppl are always risking their rank. :cool:


the reason why i say that u should choose to put ur rank at stake or not is b/c i for one (being the nice guy and VIP member that i am;and u can ask any one online about this as well) :D offten lose on purpose b/c my opponent (being a non-VIP) need rage points and i have no problem lossing on purpose to help them out to get rage, and thats why i have so many losses but that doesnt mean i suck b/c i am no currently ranked in the top 10.


any way i also think that there should be a community vote on how the ranking system should be changed (if it should be changed at all even) kinda like how every one voted for the next character, but do it like so:
lets say person#1 posts a new ranking idea then in the same forum person #2 posts another [b:post_uid10][u:post_uid10]different[/u:post_uid10][/b:post_uid10] idea and so on... also this forum would only contain new ideas no comments or flaming or bashing of other ideas and if those were posted they would be deleted by a mod.
then in another forum have a pole stating to vote for person #1's idea or person #2's idea and so on then after a given amount of time TMyApp would over look the top ohhhhh say 3 most voted on ideas then [b:post_uid10]HE[/b:post_uid10] would deside if it should be changed or not. then when the next update comes out he could change it...... so there what do u guys think about that? :dontgetit:


ED-IT:
for once i like badass' idea.... ne way with him saying that i think the option that i mentioned about choosing to risk ur rank should be offered after u choose ur characters b/c i agree that sent cyclops and wolv are cheap asss HELL .... ok im done. :stupid:[/color:post_uid10]



Edited By avilancer on 1099579552

Iplay2win 11-04-2004 06:47 AM

leave rank the way it is except it only counts on 1 on 1

and rank still counts with helpers...helpers are the savers on this game...Ive seen some cheap-ee a-z players


(

avilancer 11-04-2004 06:50 AM

you didnt make sense there Iplay.... kinda didnt make a point either...
did u even read all of what i just posted? :dontgetit:



ED-IT:
i was just saying that ifur going to reply make sense thats all
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV




Edited By avilancer on 1099580307

Iplay2win 11-04-2004 06:52 AM

pttf one more person that's against me

HELLOTHERE 11-04-2004 01:05 PM

Just leave the rank system the way it is. I mean...rank has nothing do do with skills. You could fight 200 battles a day and you rank might get worse. I remember when I joined for the first time and my rank was already in the 0-100 range and I haven't even won a match yet. Plus, if you have a bad rank, some dumb person might think they can beat you and you end up kicking their ass then you will feel good about yourself.


Dont get me wrong, the system could be alot better but what good does that do you. A person could win alot of matches but that doesn't mean they are good. It could mean they are just a ####ie killer(murderer lol).



And before I end this post I would like to say a few words.


Have fun, be safe, and have abstinence! :D




Edited By HELLOTHERE on 1099602495

coolkilla 11-04-2004 06:36 PM

[quote:post_uid0="--(-

imported_--(- 11-05-2004 09:36 PM

i kknow wat im talking about and what u said don't mean its rejected becuz u ain't nobody and the rank system we got now is crappy its too easy and its points u can have like 80 losses and 20 wins and be in top 100's atleast

TarkanX 11-06-2004 10:14 AM

All of these ideas won't work, even on paper. I believe that the best way to judge how well a player is, is by using huge tournaments (ala TOC1, or WWT), but since that happens once on a full moon, the best way to use rank is to use a judge scoring system; this system shows how well you fought, so if you fight a ####ie or someone who lets you beat them with little to no fighting, then you will barely gain any points... ahh... I had this in another topic, maybe I'll explain this later.

ledmonkey 11-06-2004 11:47 AM

<span style='font-size:7pt;line-height:100%'>Indeed that is true Tarken...

If there was somehow a way to implement damage taken into the rank process.. You could give higher rank points for closer matches..</span>

Vash 11-06-2004 12:04 PM

Tarken is right rank dont count, how well the person plays is whats important.

Shobou 11-12-2004 08:20 PM

i blame some of the charactar there ability make it so unberable not to cheat


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.05679 seconds with 13 queries